21世纪国内外农业创新采用研究的知识图谱分析

Agricultural innovation adoption research at home and abroad in the 21st century based on the Knowledge Mapping

摘要:

以中国知网数据库和WoS核心数据库为文献源，以2000—2020年农业创新采用领域文献为研究对象，借助SATI、Gephi及CiteSpace软件构建知识图谱，系统分析国内外农业创新采用研究的文献特征、核心力量、合作网络及研究热点。结果显示：（1）农业创新采用领域的文献产出呈指数增长态势，国内文献增长速度较快但规模稍逊；多学科交叉特征明显，《中国农村经济》和Agricultural Economics是代表性刊物。（2）美国是该领域的领先国；农业院校和科研机构是主要力量；Qaim M和张俊飚是高产作者；（3）国家合作网络以美国、德国、澳大利亚等国为核心，国外机构、作者合作网络发达且联系紧密，国内机构、作者合作网络松散且互动不足。（4）事前评估、决策行为及事后评价是主要议题，国外研究日臻成熟但深入空间有限，国内研究日趋全面但仍需突破创新。（5）国外农业创新采用研究呈现出视角纵深化、方法创新化、技术集成化的发展趋势，国内虽已呈现出视角拓展化、方法多样化、主体多元化的发展态势，但整体仍滞后于国外，研究深度及广度有待提高，新型经营主体是未来需重点关注的对象。

Abstract:

Taking CNKI database and WoS core database as the source of literature, taking the literature in the field of agricultural innovation adoption from 2000 to 2020 as the object, this paper systematically analyzes the literature characteristics, core forces, cooperation networks and research hotspots of agricultural innovation adoption research based on the knowledge mapping constructed by SATI, Gephi and CiteSpace. The results show that: (1) the literature output in the field of agricultural innovation adoption shows an exponential growth trend, both at home and abroad. The domestic related literature has a faster growth rate but a smaller scale than foreign literature. Agricultural innovation adoption is a multi-interdisciplinary field intersected by agriculture, economy, management science and resources science. Chinese Rural Economy and Agricultural Economics are representative journals at home and abroad respectively. (2) The United States is the leading country in this field. Agricultural colleges and research institutions are the main force in this field. Qaim M and Zhang Junbiao are high-output authors. (3) The national cooperation network is centered on the United States, Germany, Australia and other countries. The cooperation networks of foreign institutions and authors are developed and closely connected, while that of domestic institutions and authors are loose and lack of interaction. (4) Ex-ante assessment, decision-making behavior and ex-post evaluation are the main topics in the field of agricultural innovation adoption. Foreign research is becoming increasingly mature, but the space for in-depth research is limited. Domestic research is becoming more and more comprehensive, but more breakthroughs and innovations are needed. (5) The foreign research on agricultural innovation adoption has shown a development trend of continuous deepening of perspectives, continuous innovation of approaches, and continuous integration of technologies. Although domestic research has shown a trend of expanding perspectives, diversifying methods and subjects, it still lags behind foreign research as a whole and needs to be improved in terms of research depth and breadth. The new business entities are the objects that need to be focused on in the future.