高校人文社科项目制绩效评价及其改进目标统计研究
CSTR:
作者单位:

常州大学

中图分类号:

G302

基金项目:

比重加大,东部地区强于中西部地区,社会学科和交叉学科占多数,部属高校发展快于地方高校。蒋林浩、陈洪捷等[10]调查发现,人文、艺术和社科教师比较重视同行评议,以及学术领军人物对学科发展的影响,对被引次数、科研项目数等量化指标持保留态度。


Research on Performance Evaluation and Improvement Goals of Humanities and Social Sciences Projects in Colleges and Universities——Based on simultaneous equations and BP artificial neural network
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究项目是高校人文社科研究的重要支撑,对其绩效评估并明确改进目标具有重要意义。本文在深入分析高校人文社科研究投入产出诸要素关系的背景下,针对教育部世界一流大学和世界一流学科建设高校,以其人文社科研究数据为研究对象,采用联立方程模型解释项目的绩效,基于SBM-Super模型测度效率,明确改进目标,同时以确定最佳投入产出下研究项目的理想绩效为目标,探寻最优解,为确保其稳健性,需要借助BP人工神经网络进行检验。研究结果表明:人文社科项目的绩效有待提高;最佳投入下人文社科项目绩效提升较快,项目绩效水平有待提高;最佳投入下人文社科投入产出关系更匹配程度更高;人文社科投入产出效率总体进步空间巨大,主要原因是不同高校研究水平相差较大,导致纯技术效率水平较低;研究经费绩效较低需要引起足够的重视。

    Abstract:

    The research project is an important support for humanities and social science research in universities, and it is of great significance to conduct performance evaluation and clear improvement goals. Based on the thorough analysis to the university humanities and social science research input and output, on the basis of analyzing the relationship between all key elements of double first-class construction based on the ministry of education college humanities and social science research data, using simultaneous equation model the performance of the project, and uses the SBM Super model to measure the efficiency, a clear improvement objectives, and further study the best input and output under the ideal performance of the project, the BP artificial neural network is adopted to improve the robustness test. The research results show that: the performance of humanities and social sciences projects need to be improved. The performance of humanities and social sciences projects is improved quickly under the best input, and there is still a large space for the improvement of project performance. The input-output relationship of humanities and social sciences is more coordinated under the optimal input. The input-output efficiency of humanities and social sciences is generally low. The main reason is that the research level of different universities differs greatly, leading to the low level of pure technical efficiency. The low performance of research funding needs to be paid enough attention.

    参考文献
    [1]Paul M. Romer and Zvi Griliches. Implementing a National Technology Strategy with Self-Organizing Industry Investment Boards[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics, 1993(2):345-399.
    [2]Callon,M. Is Science a Public Good? [J]. Science Technology and Human Values,1994,19 ( 4) : 395-424.
    [3]Casey R J , Gentile P , Bigger S W . Teaching appraisal in higher education: An Australian perspective[J]. Higher Education, 1997,34(4):459-482.
    [4]Martin B R, Irvine J. Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy [J]. Research Policy,1983,12(83):61-90.
    [5]Costa P L,Passos A M,Bakker A B. Team work engagement: a model of emergence [J]. Journal of Occupational Organizational Pshchology,2014,87(2):414-436.
    [6]史万兵,杨慧.高等学校教师科研绩效评价方法研究[J].高教探索,2014(06):112-117.
    [7]孙凯,钱昊.基础研究项目产出绩效的量化评价体系研究——以浙江省自然科学基金为例[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(06):58-62.
    [8]周华强,邹弈星,殷明郁,王敬东.育种科研项目绩效评价创新研究:RISE模型构建及实证检验[J].中国科技论坛,2018(01):108-115.
    [9]黄华伟,杨端光.教育部社科一般项目发展现状——基于2005-2014年立项数据的实证分析[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2016,37(08):229-233.
    [10]蒋林浩,陈洪捷,黄俊平.人文?艺术和社会学科评估指标体系研究——基于对大学教师的调查[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(02):52-61.
    [11]Sharma S, Thomas V J. Inter - country R D Efficiency Analysis: Application of Data Envelopment Analysis [J]. Scientometrics,2008,76(3):483-501.
    [12]段庆锋.基于两阶段DEA的科学基金项目产出评价研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2012,27(11):87-91.
    [13]张娇,汪雪锋,廖青云,李佳.基于问卷调查的国家自然科学基金人才项目资助绩效评价[J].中国科学基金,2017,31(05):481-488.
    [14]段晓梅.系统思维下我国高校科研绩效的超效率DEA评价[J].系统科学学报,2019,27(04):51-54+76.
    [15]Catherine,B., S. Allaoui. Impact of Public and Private Research Funding on Scientific Production: The Case of Nanotechnology[J]. Research Policy,2012,41(9):1589-1606.
    [16]Auranen,O., M. Nieminen. University Research Funding and Publication Performance—An International Comparison[J]. Research Policy,2010,39(6):822-834.
    [17]Hussler C,Picard F,Tang M F. Taking the ivory from the tower to coat the economic world: Regional strategies to make science useful [J]. Technovation,2010,30 (9):508-518.
    [18]Este,Patel. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? [J]. Research Policy,2007,36 (9):1295-1313.
    [19]郑丽霞,翟磊.产学研合作项目模式与高校科研绩效——R D投入的中介作用[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(02):104-110.
    [20]王立良,王道明.多角度评价高校科研团队创新能力绩效[J].中国高校科技,2019(06):36-38.
    [21]马健.科研项目评价制度的缺陷及其完善[J].自然辩证法研究,2010,26(10):120-124.
    [22]胡敏.高等教育项目制的府学博弈与治理——以G省高水平大学建设项目为例[J].教育发展研究,2018,38(19):42-49.
    [23]周怀峰.科研项目课题制?学术风气和学术精神[J].学术界,2012(07):154-161+289.
    [24]Ruiz J L, Sirvent I. Performance evaluation through DEA benchmarking adjusted to goals[J]. Omega, 2019, 87: 150-157
    [25]Rumelhart D E,Hinton G E, Williams R J. Learning representations by back-propagation error[J].Nature,1998,323(9):533-536.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

俞立平.高校人文社科项目制绩效评价及其改进目标统计研究[J].,2023,(21).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-03
  • 最后修改日期:2023-05-24
  • 录用日期:2023-06-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-27
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!
关闭
关闭