基于I-CAGE框架，以62个国家为案例国，采用NCA与fsQCA探究中国知识产权国际贸易的组态路径，剖析创新因素、文化因素、制度因素、地理因素和经济因素对中国知识产权贸易竞争力的协同效应。研究结果表明：不存在导致中国知识产权高出口额和高进口额的单个必要条件，但制度因素对知识产权进口和出口，创新因素对进口发挥着相对重要的作用。对于中国知识产权贸易的高出口，存在三条路径：“经济驱动下制度主导型”、“文化驱动下创新主导型”和“经典CAGE主导型”。对于中国知识产权贸易的高进口，也存在三条路径：“经济驱动下制度或创新主导型”、“制度和创新主导型”和“经典CAGE主导型”。

Based on the I-CAGE framework, taking 62 countries as case countries, this paper uses NCA and fsQCA to explore the configuration path of China"s international trade in intellectual property, and analyzes the synergistic effects of innovation factors, cultural factors, administrative factors, geographical factors and economic factors on China"s competitiveness in intellectual property trade. The results show that: there is no single necessary condition leading to the high export and import of intellectual property in China, but institutional factors play a relatively important role in the import and export of intellectual property, and innovation factors play a relatively important role in the import. For the high export of China"s intellectual property trade, there are three paths: "economic driven and administration leading", "cultural driven and innovation leading" and "classic CAGE leading". For the high import of China"s intellectual property trade, there are also three paths: "economic driven and administration-or-innovation leading", "administration-and-innovation leading" and "classic CAGE leading".

F746.17;F204

北京联合大学项目“基于省域专利转移网络分析的北京市高精尖产业创新地位及其提升策略研究”资助，项目编号SK30202309