政策工具视角下省属科研院所改革发展政策文本研究——以江西省为例

Research on the Reform and Development Policy Texts of Provincial Research Institutes from the Perspective of Policy Instrument: Taking Jiangxi Province as an Example

摘要:

全面系统梳理省属科研院所改革发展政策的演变脉络，进一步总结已有经验，能够有效促进科研院所进行科技创新活动，促进当地科技与经济的有效融合，发挥省属科研院所在科技创新发展中的重要作用。以江西省为例，从供给型、需求型与环境型3个维度确定13种政策工具分类体系，并对21世纪以来江西省颁布的104份省属科研院所改革发展相关政策文本进行内容分析，通过编码技术分阶段梳理政策工具选择特点与变化，总结已有经验，识别制约科研院所改革发展的政策障碍并提出相应的建议。结果发现：科研院所改革历程划可分为启动与探索、创新发展、创新驱动3个阶段；有关政策目前存在呈现碎片化倾向、各类政策之间缺乏协调配合、政策工具组合方式有待优化、行政引导政策工具使用比例高、技术交易政策工具仍有待加强等问题。基于此提出强化统筹协调、优化政策工具的使用、深化协同创新等建议。

Abstract:

Provincial scientific research institutes are important components of the innovation chain. Formulating and implementing relevant policies for the reform and development of provincial scientific research institutes can directly affect the effectiveness of their reform and development and promote their important role in scientific and technological innovation and development. Taking Jiangxi Province as an example, a classification system of 13 policy tools was established across three dimensions: supply-oriented, demand-oriented, and environment-oriented. Content analysis was conducted on 104 policy documents related to the reform and development of provincial research institutes in Jiangxi province since the 21st century. Using coding techniques, this study systematically reviewed the characteristics and changes in policy tool selection across different phases, summarized existing experiences, identified policy barriers restricting the reform and development of research institutes, and proposed corresponding recommendations. The results show that: the reform process of scientific research institutes can be divided into three stages: initiation and exploration, innovative development, and innovation-driven advancement. Current policies exhibit several issues, including a tendency toward fragmentation, a lack of coordination and integration among different policies, suboptimal combinations of policy tools, a high reliance on administrative guidance tools, and insufficient emphasis on policy tools for technology transfer. Based on these observations, recommendations are proposed to strengthen overall coordination, optimize the use of policy tools, and deepen collaborative innovation.