团队任务冲突是一把“双刃剑”,它既可能通过促进信息分享提高团队决策质量,也可能会转化为关系冲突对决策质量产生负面影响。如何既发挥任务冲突对决策质量的正面作用,又尽量避免其可能产生的负面作用,成为决策团队亟待解决的问题。鉴于求知动机可以提升团队成员对信息的的专注度和需求度,有可能在任务冲突和决策质量之间起到一个有益的调节作用,本文就在研究中引入求知动机作为“团队冲突——决策质量”的调节变量。本文通过行为实验方法模拟团队决策过程,以任务冲突为研究起点,探寻求知动机在决策过程中对团队冲突的影响,以及求知动机和任务冲突的交互作用对决策质量的影响。结果发现：求知动机可以对任务冲突和决策质量的关系起到非常显著的正向调节作用；并且可以有效地缓解任务冲突向关系冲突的转化。这两种作用使得在高求知动机状态下,任务冲突与决策质量之间呈现出正相关关系。

s: Team task conflict is a “double-edged sword”. It can increase the team decision-making quality through improving the information sharing, but it can also transform into relationship conflict to have a negative impact on decision-making quality. How to play the positive role of task conflict on decision-making quality and avoid the negative effect is a critical problem faced by the decision-making team. Epistemic motivation can improve the team members’ attention and demand for information, so it may play a positive role between the task conflict and decision-making quality. Therefore, this thesis uses the behavioral experiments to simulate the team decision making, regards the task conflict as the research starting point, and explores the influence of epistemic motivation on team conflicts and the influence of the interaction of epistemic motivation and conflicts on decision-making quality.The results state that epistemic motivation can play a remarkable positive moderating effect between task conflict and decision-making quality, and can prevent task conflict from transforming into relationship conflict effectively. So, under the condition of high epistemic motivation, the relationship between task conflict and decision-making quality is positive.

国家自然科学基金项目（面上项目，重点项目，重大项目）