中小企业开放式创新商业化模式分析 ——基于8个中小企业的案例研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国科学技术大学公共事务学院,中国科学技术大学公共事务学院,中国科学技术大学公共事务学院,中国科学技术大学公共事务学院

中图分类号:

F270

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“中小企业开放式创新的商业化网络机制研究”(71202054)


The Analysis of SMEs’ Commercialization Models Under the Paradigm of Open Innovation --Based on Eight SMEs’ Cases
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在开放式创新范式下,中小企业如何基于自身资源和外部环境两个维度来选择不同的商业化战略是本文主要讨论的问题。中小企业在开放式创新过程中采取不同的商业化模式是根据自身的资源禀赋和外界环境变动而作出的战略决策,从而达到各商业主体动态共生的生态系统。文章经过相关理论的分析,列举了中小企业进行开放式创新商业化的四种典型模式,并通过运用多案例研究方法,选取8个科技型中小企业作为研究样本,充分解释了中小企业在资源丰裕度和环境不确定性两个维度的综合作用下,如何作出商业化模式的战略选择问题。文章综合考量了企业、企业之间和企业网络三个层面,进一步充实和延伸了开放式创新理论。同时,文章对于指导中小企业如何选择适合自身发展的商业化模式具有重要作用。

    Abstract:

    In the open innovation paradigm, how SMEs choose different business strategies based on their own resources and the external environment dimensions is the main problem discussed in this paper. In the process of open innovation, SMEs adopt different commercialization models is based on the extent of enterprises’ resources abundance and market uncertainty faced by enterprises, so as to achieve the business entity dynamic symbiotic ecosystem. Through the analysis of relevant theories, the paper list four typical SMEs’ commercialization models, through the use of multi case study method, select eight tech SMEs as the research sample, and fully explain how SMEs make the strategic choice of commercialization model selection under the extent of enterprises’ resources abundance and market uncertainty faced by enterprises. The paper comprehensively considers three levels of ego, dyadic relation and network, further enrich and extend the theory of open innovation. At the same time, the paper plays an important role in the suitable selection of commercialization models of SMEs.

    参考文献
    [1] Rothaermel F T, Deeds D L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(3): 201-221.
    [2] Chesbrough H W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M]. Harvard Business Press, 2006.
    [3] Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2):131-150.
    [4] 李召敏, 赵曙明. 环境不确定性、任务导向型战略领导行为与组织绩效[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016(2):136-148.
    [5] Li H, Atuahene- Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(6):1123-1134.
    [6] Wan W P, Yiu D W. From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(7):791-801.
    [7] Grant R M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation[J]. California Management Review, 1991, 33(3): 114-135.
    [8] 陈钰芬, 陈劲. 开放度对企业技术创新绩效的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(2):419-426.
    [9] Chesbrough H W. The era of open innovation[J]. Mit Sloan Management Review, 2003, 44(3): 35-41.
    [10] Huang F, Rice J. Openness in product and process innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2012, 16(04): 1-24.
    [11] Clercq D D, Dimo Dimov. Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(3):585-612.
    [12] Gassmann O, Enkel E. Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes[C].R&D management conference. 2004, 6(0): 1-18.
    [13] Simard C, West J. Knowledge networks and the geographic locus of innovation[M]// Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. London: Oxford University Press,2006: 220-240.
    [14] Lazzarotti V, Manzini R. Different modes of open innovation: a theoretical framework and an empirical study[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2009, 13(04): 615-636.
    [15] Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom R S. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies[J]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2002, 11(3):529-555.
    [16] Porter M E. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(12):95-117.
    [17] Burgelman R A. Intra-Organizational Ecology of Strategy-Making and Organizational Adaptation[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(3):239-262.
    [18] 罗仲伟,任国良,焦豪,等.动态能力,技术范式转变与创新战略——基于腾讯微信“整合”与“迭代”微创新的纵向案例分析[J].管理世界, 2014(8):152-168.
    [19] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(5):171-180.
    [20] Koka B R, Madhavan R, Prescott J E. The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3): 721-737.
    [21] Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1): 14-37.
    [22] Chesbrough H. Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(2-3):354-363.
    [23] Bengtsson M, Kock S. Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks[J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 1999, 14(3):178-194.
    [24] 刘志迎, 李芹芹. 产业链上下游链合创新联盟的博弈分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(6): 36-41.
    [25] Easton G, Araujo L. Management Research and Literary Criticism[J]. British Journal of Management, 2002, 8(1):99-106.
    [26] 闫娜, 叶海超, 邸伟娜. 石油工程技术商业化模式选择策略研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013(16):119-123.
    [27] Eisenhart K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases: challenges and opportunities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 25-32.
    [28] Eisenhardt K M. Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(3): 620-627.
    [29] Yin R K. Applications of Case Study Research (Applied Social Research Methods) [M].Series,4th ed.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, 2003:52-72
    [30] Jick T D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979: 602-611.
    [31] Eisenhardt K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 532-550.
    [32] Martin J A, Eisenhardt K M. Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(2): 265-301.
    [33] Galunic D C, Rodan S. Research Notes and Communications: Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(12): 1193-1201.
    [34] Helfat C E, Eisenhardt K M. Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(13): 1217-1232.
    引证文献
引用本文

彭小宝,陈鼎祥,刘善伟,焦进寒.中小企业开放式创新商业化模式分析 ——基于8个中小企业的案例研究[J].,2017,(9).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-28
  • 最后修改日期:2017-04-11
  • 录用日期:2016-09-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-18
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!
关闭
关闭