系统评价/Meta分析在中医药科研中的应用评价

Evaluation of the Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis Application in the Research of TCM:Based on Bibliometrics Analysis of CJFD

摘要:

目的：了解系统评价/Meta分析在中医药科研中的应用情况，为后期研究提供参考；方法：计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库2015年前收录的中医药系统评价/Meta分析文献，按照设定的排除标准确定纳入文献，采用文献计量学方法对年代分布、来源期刊、发表机构、核心作者、合作发文、基金资助、研究内容进行统计分析；结果：共纳入文献1735篇，最早的文献起始于1997年，文献来源于302个期刊，第一作者分布在515个机构，涉及境内30个省（市、自治区）和美国、丹麦、香港、澳门，有21位作者发表论文达到10篇以上，论文的合著率为93.0%、合作度为3.76，有30.4%的论文得到了基金资助，干预手段为药物干预（69.6%）、非药物干预（24.9%）和联合干预（5.5%），文献涉及的病种按ICD-10分类共19个大类；结论：近年来系统评价/Meta分析在中医药科研中的应用取得快速的发展，论文数量显著增长、核心期刊占比较高、发表机构分布广泛、研究团队逐步形成、基金课题较为关注、应用领域不断扩展，但是研究开展的地区分布并不平衡、研究质量也存在较大差异，后期应该加强相关方法学研究，正确使用和合理解读系统评价/Meta分析，努力提高研究的质量。

关键词:中医药;系统评价;Meta分析;应用评价;文献计量学

Abstract:

Objective: This study is to realize systematic reviews/meta-analysis application in the research of TCM and to provide the reference for later studies. Methods: We got systematic reviews/meta-analysis literature of TCM in CJFD from 2015 years ago by the method of computer retrieval, determined in accordance with the exclusion criteria set into the literature. To make a statistic assay of distribution of time, contents distribution, issuing authorities, core authors, published collaboration, fund-sponsored papers and research contents by a bibliometric analysis. Results: There were 1735 papers included. The earliest literature began in 1997 from 302 journals. The first author distributed in 515 institutions, involving domestic 30 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) and the United States, Denmark, Hong Kong and Macao.21 authors have published more than 10 papers, co-authored papers at a rate of 93.0%, the cooperation degree was 3.76, 30.4% of the paper got the fund. Interventions include drug intervention (69.6%), non-drug intervention (24.9%) and the combined intervention (5.5%). Literature relating to 19 disease categories according to the ICD - 10 categories. Conclusion: Meta analysis application in the research of TCM achieved rapid development in recent years. The number of papers rised significantly. Proportion of core periodicals was high. Published agencies distributed widely. Research teams formed gradually. Fund quantity increased year by year. Application fields keep expanding. It is worth noting that regional distribution was not balanced and the research had different qualities. We should strengthen research methodology, correct use and reasonable understand systematic reviews/meta-analysis, and strive to improve the quality of the related research.

Key words:Traditional Chinese Medicine, Systematic reviews, Meta-analysis, Application evaluation, Bibliometric method