基于高校学术行政化趋势的加深，本文选取2008年和2014年共5128项国家社科基金立项项目数据及主持人信息为样本，从“行政化教师”角度出发，利用多元有序Probit模型和倾向得分匹配方法（PSM）实证研究了“双权融合”对学术资源配置的影响。结果显示，probit估计发现在控制自身禀赋后，“双权”会对资源配置产生正向显著影响，倾向得分匹配法发现“双权”会达到约11%的影响效应。研究还发现，行政权力获得优质学术资源概率相较学术权力要高出约3%，但呈现疲软态势；随着行政级别的提升，“双权”对资源的影响程度会趋于加强，且越高级别资源这种趋势会越显著。研究对于完善学术监督与权力监督机制，规范“双权融合”对学术资源配置的影响以及保障学术自由具有重要意义。

With the deepening of the administrative tendency, this paper examines the effect of dual power integration on academic resource allocation by multivariate ordinal probit models and propensity score matching (PSM), using a sample of 5128 National Social Science Fund Project data in 2008 and 2014. Through rigorous exercises, we find that the "dual power" will have a positive impact on the allocation of academic resources, after the control of the University Scholars' own endowment, and improve the impact of 11% by means of PSM. And the probability of the administrative power to obtain the resources is about 3% higher than the academic power, which is beginning to show a weakening trend. With the upgrading of the administrative level, the impact of the dual power on the resources will tend to strengthen, and the trend will be more significant at a higher level of resources. The research is of great significance to improve the academic supervision and the power supervision mechanism, and regulate the influence of the "dual power integration" on the academic resource allocation and the protection of academic freedom.

F204

无