自己做还是找人合作?开放性悖论下企业研发行为对产品创新的影响研究
CSTR:
作者单位:

南京大学商学院,南京大学商学院,南京大学商学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Make Your Own or Cooperate with Others? The Effect of R&D Behavior on Firm’s Product Innovation Based on the Paradox of Openness
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [37]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    现有的关于独立研发与合作研发关系的研究结论不一致。而我国企业目前正处于从模仿式创新向自主式创新的转型阶段,企业具有开展独立研发与合作研发的强烈需求。因此,从开放性悖论的视角出发,在分别验证独立研发和合作研发对产品创新的作用基础上,重点探究两种研发行为同时进行时对产品创新的影响,并进一步考察知识产权机制对以上关系的影响。通过对286家制造企业的实证研究,发现:(1)独立研发与合作研发都对创新有积极的影响,但两者同时进行时却对创新具有消极的影响;(2)知识产权机制有利于促进独立、合作研发对创新的积极影响,削弱同时开展两种研发时对创新的消极影响。

    Abstract:

    The existing research conclusions about the relationship between independent R&D and cooperative R&D are inconsistent. Our country’s firms are now on their transformation processfrom imitation innovation to indigenous innovation, and the firms have a strong demand to be engaged in independent R&D and cooperative R&D. Therefore, from the angle of the open paradox, this article will verify the effects of independent R&D and cooperative R&D on product innovation, and then focus on exploring the effect of working on the two kinds of R&D behavior at the same time on product innovation. Further, considering that the biggest concern under the paradox of openness is the leak of important knowledge, this article will examine the protection effect of intellectual property rights on the three kinds of R&D behavior to answer whether the intellectual property rights can solve the problem of “paradox of openness”. With an empirical study of 286 manufacturing firms, this article finds that: (1) Both independent R&D and cooperative R&D have a positive effect on innovation, but they will have a negative influence on innovation when operated at the same time; (2) Mechanisms of intellectual property rights are beneficial to promote the positive influence of the independent, cooperative R&D on innovation, and weaken the negative impact of carrying out independent R&D and cooperative R&D at the same time.

    参考文献
    [1] 吴晓波, 吴东. 全球制造网络与中国大中型企业的自主创新[J]. 科技管理研究, 2010, 4: 3-5.
    [2] 樊霞, 任畅翔, 刘炜. 产学研合作与企业独立研发关系的进一步检验——基于企业R&D投入门槛效应的分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(1):85-91.
    [3] 李林蔚. 竞合、组织双元性与联盟企业知识生成策略[J]. 科学学研究, 2016(6).
    [4] Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H. Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon[J]. R&d Management, 2009, 39(4): 311-316.
    [5] Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B. Complementarity in R&D Cooperation Strategies[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2006, 28(4):401-426.
    [6] Kaisa Henttonen ?, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P, Ritala P. Managing the appropriability of R&D collaboration[J]. R & D Management, 2015.
    [7] Gans J S, Stern S. The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs[J]. Research policy, 2003, 32(2): 333-350.
    [8] Chesbrough H. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape[M]. Harvard Business Press, 2013.
    [9] Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[M]//The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Princeton University Press, 1962: 609-626.
    [10] Laursen K, Salter A J. The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(5): 867-878.
    [11] 郑晓明, 丁玲, 欧阳桃花. 双元能力促进企业服务敏捷性——海底捞公司发展历程案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2012 (2): 131-147.
    [12] Lichtenthaler U, Ernst H. Opening up the innovation process: the role of technology aggressiveness[J]. R&d Management, 2009, 39(1): 38-54.
    [13] Cassiman B, Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J]. Management science, 2006, 52(1): 68-82.
    [14] Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic management journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150.
    [15] Kraft K, Jirjahn U. Do spillovers stimulate incremental or drastic product innovations? Hypotheses and evidence from German establishment data[J]. Hypotheses and Evidence from German Establishment Data, 2006: 06-023.
    [16] 刘洋, 魏江, 应瑛. 组织二元性: 管理研究的一种新范式[J]. 浙江大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2011, 41(6): 132-142.
    [17] 胡小娟, 董少然. 模仿创新、自主创新与我国技术进步——实证研究与问题探讨[J]. 管理现代化, 2015, 35(1):67-69.
    [18] Teece D J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy[J]. Research policy, 1986, 15(6): 285-305.
    [19] Arora A, Athreye S, Huang C. The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators[J]. UNU-MERIT Working Papers, 2015, 031.
    [20] Hurmelinna P, Kyl?heiko K, Jauhiainen T. The Janus face of the appropriability regime in the protection of innovations: Theoretical re-appraisal and empirical analysis[J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(3): 133-144.
    [21] 高艳红. 基于独立研发模式的机床企业技术能力研究[J]. 兰州大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010, 38(F00): 74-79.
    [22] 金星, 汪斌, 张旭昆. 标准导向型技术的合作与独立研发[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(2): 19-28.
    [23] Faems D, Van Looy B, Debackere K. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach*[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2005, 22(3): 238-250.
    [24] Sousa A G D, Braga M J, Meyer L F F. Impact of Cooperation on the R&D Activities of Brazilian Firms[J]. Procedia Economics & Finance, 2015, 24:172-181.
    [25] Lawson B, Petersen K J, Cousins P D, et al. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms*[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009, 26(2): 156-172.
    [26] 高翠娟, 尹志红. 中小企业自主创新能力的构成要素及提升策略[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2013, 6(2).
    [27] Williamson O E. The Mechanism of Governance, New York: Oxford Univ[J]. 1996.
    [28] Williamson O E. The institutions of governance[J]. The American Economic Review, 1998, 88(2): 75-79.
    [29] Earnshaw A. Patent strategy helps protect intellectual property[J]. The Business Journal, Portland, January, 2002.
    [30] Marengo L, Pasquali C, Valente M, et al. Appropriability, patents, and rates of innovation in complex products industries[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2012, 21(8): 753-773.
    [31] Lichtenthaler U. Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2010, 52(3/4): 372-391.
    [32] Chesbrough H. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation[J]. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 2006: 1-12.
    [33] Chandy R K, Tellis G J. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1998: 474-487.
    [34] Talke K, Salomo S, Rost K. How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(7): 907-918.
    [35] Akgün A E, Keskin H, Byrne J C, et al. Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance[J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(9): 501-513.
    [36] Kotabe M, Martin X, Domoto H. Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the US and Japanese automotive industries[J]. Strategic management journal, 2003, 24(4): 293-316.
    [37] 刘志阳. 从自主创新到创新获利[J]. 学术月刊, 2014(04):88-96.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张文红,王丹萍,陈斯蕾.自己做还是找人合作?开放性悖论下企业研发行为对产品创新的影响研究[J].,2018,(3).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:531
  • 下载次数: 76
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-16
  • 最后修改日期:2017-05-08
  • 录用日期:2017-05-31
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-03-07
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!
关闭
关闭