Abstract:Under the background of the national innovation-driven development strategy, it is meaningful to expand the innovation field and carry out scientific performance evaluation to improve the innovation acceleration. In this paper, the innovation activities include two aspects, the one is mainstream innovation which focuses on the traditional innovative field, the other one is new-stream innovation which is committed to expanding the new innovative field, according to the different characteristics, the mainstream and new-stream innovation performance evaluation systems were constructed, and the methods of membership analysis and correlation analysis were used to streamline the evaluation systems, the result of the reliability and validity test showed that the two evaluation systems met the requirement, they were useful to reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the different innovation field.