美英德日国立科研机构绩效评估制度探析1

Performance Evaluation of National Scientific Research Institutions: the Experiences from the USA , the UK, Germany and Japan

摘要:

选取美国、德国、英国、日本四个典型国家,研究分析四国国立科研机构评估原则、目标计划循环管理模式、不同类型绩效评估的互补运用、评估专家的遴选、评估内容和指标的选取、评估方法以及评估结果的反馈与应用等科研机构绩效评估制度要素特征、表现形式和发展动向,对我国启动中的中央级科研机构绩效评估工作,提供有益的国际经验启示和借鉴。

Abstract:

This paper selects four typical countries: the United States, Germany, Britain and Japan, to explores the performance evaluation principles of the four countries" government scientific research institutions, the PDCAScycle management mode, the complementary use of different types of performance evaluation, the selection of experts, evaluation indicators and methods, as well as the feedback and application of evaluation results. Key elements features, forms and trends of development are summarized, in order to provide international best practices for China’s ongoing performance evaluation of scientific research institutions at the central level.