基于泰尔指数的粤港澳大湾区碳生产率差异分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广西大学公共管理学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“城市用地扩张的碳排放效应与减碳公共政策研究”(71403045)


An Analysis on the Difference of Carbon Productivity in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area in China Based on the Method of the Theil Index
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    粤港澳大湾区将建设为世界级城市群,由于我国存在“一国两制”的基本国策,粤港澳大湾区的经济水平和碳排放存在较大差异。本文利用泰尔指数来测度2005—2014年粤港澳大湾区碳生产率的差异,并构建双重差分模型检验“一国两制”制度对碳生产率差异的影响。结果表明:1)2005以来粤地区的碳生产率远远低于港澳地区的碳生产率;2)2005年以来粤港澳大湾区区间碳生产率差异较小,区内碳生产率差异较大,且大湾区碳生产率总差异虽然呈下降趋势,但仍然较大;3)粤港澳大湾区碳生产率的总差异主要来自区域内差异,而区域内差异主要是由港澳地区差异所引起,且港澳地区的碳生产率差异对总差异的贡献率在逐年增大;4)“一国两制”对粤港澳大湾区的碳生产率具有显著正向影响。在此基础上,提出促进粤港澳大湾区低碳发展的政策建议。

    Abstract:

    The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area of China will be built into a world-class city group. Because of the basic national policy of "one country, two systems", the economic level and carbon emission of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area have great differences. Taking the 2005—2014 panel data of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area, we use the Theil index, to measure the Bay Area-productivity differences and build a Difference-in- Differences model and a fixed effect model to analyze "one country, two systems" affecting the carbon productivity. The results are as follows: 1) since 2005, the carbon productivity in Guangdong region is far below the carbon productivity in Hong Kong and Macao region; 2) the interval carbon productivity difference is small, the regional carbon productivity differences is big, the total difference of carbon productivity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao has declined since 2005, but it is still larger; 3)The total difference of carbon productivity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao mainly comes from the interval difference, and the interval difference is mainly caused by the differences between Hong Kong and Macao, and the contribution rate of Hong Kong and Macao''s carbon productivity difference to the total difference is increasing year by year; 4) “one country, two systems” has significant positive effect on the carbon productivity. On this basis, we put forward proposals to promote low-carbon development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Marco Greater Bay Area.

    参考文献
    [1] 李克强总理会见中外记者并答记者问(全文实录)[EB/ON].中国政府网,2018-03-20.http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-03/20/content_5275962.htm#1.
    [2] 余金龙,赵文会,涂晓颖.基于泰尔指数法的金砖国家和七国集团地区碳生产率差异研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(18):218-223.
    [3] 康晓娟,杨冬民.基于泰尔指数法的中国能源消费区域差异分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(3):485-490.
    [4] 林坚,马珣.中国城市群土地利用效率测度[J].城市问题,2014(5):9-14+60.
    [5] 朱烨.城市土地集约利用与低碳城市的时空耦合协调度研究[D].中国海洋大学,2015.
    [6] 苏万春.珠三角城市碳排放强度及产业结构的比较研究[J].特区经济,2011(6):24-26.
    [7] 黄华,蔡克光,邢谷锐.基于碳平衡视角的广东省城市低碳发展特征及对策研究[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(11):12-18.
    [8] 胡建辉,蒋选.城市群视角下城镇化对碳排放的影响效应研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2015,15(6):11-21.
    [9] 张协奎.城市群资源整合与协调发展研究:以广西北部湾城市群为例[M].中国社会科学出版社,S2012.
    [10] GILL B, MOELLER S. GHG Emissions and the Rural-Urban Divide. A Carbon Footprint Analysis Based on the German Official Income and Expenditure Survey[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 145:160-169.
    [11] WAISMAN HD, GUIVARCH C, LECOCQ F. The transportation sector and low-carbon growth pathways: modelling urban, infrastructure, and spatial determinants of mobility[J]. Climate Policy, 2013,13 (sup01):106-129.
    [12] VOYTENKO Y, MCCORMICK K, EVANS J, et al. Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016,123:45-54.
    [13] VLASOV D, NINA D. Scientific and Methodological Basis of Development of the Park-and-Ride Facilities in the Intermodal Transport Hubs of Moscow Agglomeration[J] Advanced Materials Research, 2014 (869-870): 201-204.
    [14] COASE R. The New Institutional Economics.SThe American Economic Review,1998,S88(2), 72-74. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/116895.
    [15] WILLIANMSON, OLIVER E.The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.SJournal of Economic Literature,S2000,38 (3): 595-613.
    [16] DAVIS L E, North D C, Smorodin C. Institutional change and American economic growth[M]. CUP Archive, 1971.
    [17] 张五常.新制度经济学的来龙去脉[J].交大法学,2015(3):8-19.
    [18] PUHANI PA. The treatment effect, the cross difference, and the interaction term in nonlinear “difference-in-difference” models[J]. Economics Letters,2012,115(1): 85-87.
    [19] 袁从帅,刘晔,王治华,刘睿智.“营改增”对企业投资、研发及劳动雇佣的影响——基于中国上市公司双重差分模型的分析[J].中国经济问题,2015(4):3-13.
    [20] 龙如银,邵天翔.中国三大经济圈碳生产率差异及影响因素[J].资源科学,2015,37(6):1249-1257.
    [21] 内地加大对港能源支持力度[EB/OL]. (2011-08-31)[2018-04-23].http://energy.people.com.cn/GB/15552393.html.
    [22] 澳门将增加输入内地电力解决增长的电力消耗[EB/OL]. (2006-07-05)[2018-04-23].https://news.qq.com/a/20060705/001041.htm.
    [23] 2014年深圳国民经济和社会发展统计公报.
    [24] 2014年广州市国民经济和社会发展统计公报.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

汪晗,代晓玲,聂鑫.基于泰尔指数的粤港澳大湾区碳生产率差异分析[J].,2019,(12).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:822
  • 下载次数: 59
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-22
  • 最后修改日期:2018-10-08
  • 录用日期:2018-10-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-01
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!
关闭
关闭