不同学科科研合作差异的比较研究

Comparative study of the differences in scientific research cooperation among different disciplines——Take114 leaders of the ministry of education"s innovation team in 2017

摘要:

合作科研、团队攻关已成为现代社会生产条件下科学技术研究活动的内在要求,不同学科科研产量和科研质量的提高,与合作模式、团队的规模、学科结构等密切相关。研究通过对114位不同学科带头人的科研论文合作规律进行分析,结果显示：一、不同学科的合作模式存在较大的差异,合作方式上,管理学和人文社科类倾向于“个人独著”以及“小规模的团队合作”,理、工、农、医存在较大的相似性,更加倾向于多人合作的方式,且更倾向于“大规模的团队合作”；二,在合作过程中,合作人数的增加并不能显著提高科研产出。研究发现,合作模式是影响科研产出的重要因素,学科特性是决定合作模式的重要影响因素,合作模式和学科特性二者共同作用,影响着不同学科科研合作的差异。

Abstract:

Cooperative scientific research and team research have become the inherent requirements of scientific and technological research activities under the production conditions of modern society, the improvement of scientific research output and quality of different disciplines is closely related to the cooperation model, the scale of the team, and the structure of disciplines. Through the analysis of the cooperation rules of 114 leaders in different disciplines, the results show that: First, there are great differences in the modes of cooperation between different disciplines. In terms of cooperation, management and humanities and social sciences tend to be individual works alone" and "small scale teamwork". There is a greater similarity between science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine, more inclined to multi-person cooperation, and more inclined to "large-scale teamwork"; Second, in the process of cooperation, the increase in the number of collaborators can not significantly improve the scientific research output. It is found that the cooperative mode is an important factor affecting the scientific research output, and the disciplinary characteristics are the important factors that determine the cooperative model. The cooperative mode and the disciplinary characteristics work together and affect the differences of the scientific research cooperation between different disciplines.