批判与纠偏：高校科研成果奖励的规约性及影响

Criticism and Correction: The Regularity and influence of rewards for Scientific Research achievements in Universities

摘要:

我国高校将科研成果奖励作为其学术治理体系及治理能力现代化构建的主要部分,以一系列的科研成果奖励活动规约着大学学术场域的研究,诱发着大学学术成果的符号等级、等值兑换等非常规的科研评价机制的形成,使学术奖励从最初是一种激励大学教师开展学术研究的制度,演化成他们为获得学术奖励而研究的一种精神导向和行为法则。它一方面激励、导向大学教师向学术资源丰硕的资本领域推进,另一方面也裹挟、诱导他们在学术生产中形成趋利避害、避实就虚、投机取巧等不好的研究惯习。因而其学术场域也就隐匿着“多重危机”：奖励的追求中异化着学术研究的动机；奖励的逐使中化约着学术研究成为其“附庸品”；奖励的判别中掩饰着学术研究的“虚假性”。为此,大学学术研究要从“危机”中走向“转机”,还需高校纠偏科研评价场域有失偏颇的奖励机制,淡化科研成果的相关奖励,旨归学术场域的本真状态。

Abstract:

Chinese universities take the reward of scientific research achievements as the main part of the modernization construction of their academic governance system and governance capacity.It regulates the research of the academic field of university with a series of scientific research achievement reward activities, and induces the formation of unconventional scientific research evaluation mechanism such as symbol grade and equivalent exchange of university academic achievements, which changed the academic incentive system from a system that initially encouraged university teachers to carry out academic research to a spiritual guidance and behavioral law that they studied to obtain academic rewards.On the one hand, university teachers are encouraged and guided to advance in the field of capital with abundant academic resources; on the other hand, they are also restrained and induced to form bad research habits in academic production, such as seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, avoiding reality and taking shortcuts,etc.So " crises" are hidden in the academic field of universities, including the pursuit of reward dissimilates the motivation of academic research,the reduction of rewards has made academic research its "appendage". the judgment of rewards conceals the "falsity" of academic achievements. Therefore, in order to turn from "crisis" to "turning point", the real academic research also needs the reward mechanism of correcting bias in the field of scientific research evaluation in colleges and universities, and the relevant rewards for scientific research achievements should be downplayed, so as to realize the true state of academic field.