科技类社会组织资源获取模式评价——基于武汉市的实证研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.武汉工程大学 管理学院;2.华中科技大学 公共管理学院;3.武汉工程大学 马克思主义学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C939 G311

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“党建引领社会组织提升社会治理效能的逻辑机理与实践策略研究”(19BDJ011)


Evaluation of the Resource Acquisition Model of Scientific and Technological Social Organizations from the Perspective of Organizational Growth : Empirical Study of Wuhan
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    资源是影响科技类社会组织成长水平与作用发挥的核心要素。当前,科技类社会组织成长资源获取存在着非市场化竞争、路径依赖、渠道狭窄等现实问题。基于此,研究运用AHP和模糊综合评价法对武汉市81家科技类社会组织资源获取模式进行实证评价发现,采取“合谋”模式获取成长资源的社会组织效率最高,“服务”模式其次,“依附”模式效率最低。而在“合谋”与“依附”模式下,科技类社会组织容易陷入被合谋或依附对象所操控的困境,进而造成外部控制增强、独立性缺失、公信力降低,并最终导致组织成长“消亡”。因此,需进一步完善科技类社会组织资源获取过程监管,建立科技类社会组织公共服务“供需”采购机制与能力评价体系,减小政府与科技类社会组织“非对称性依赖”关系,促进科技类社会组织间有效合作,构建科学、公平、规范、高效的可持续性资源获取模式。

    Abstract:

    Resources are the core elements that affect the growth level and function of scientific and technological social organizations. Now, there exist some questions of reality, for instance ,non-market competition, path dependence, narrow channels, etc. Based on this, this study used AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to conduct empirical evaluation on the resource acquisition mode of Wuhan scientific and technological social organizations, and found that the efficiency of scientific and technological social organizations using "collusion" mode evaluation to obtain organizational growth resources was the highest, "service" mode was next and "attachment" mode was the lowest. Nevertheless, under the modes of "collusion" and "attachment",scientific and technological social organizationsare prone to be manipulated by the conspirators or the objects to which they are attached, which in turn leads to the enhancement of external control, the loss of independence, the decrease of credibility, and finally the demise of the organization. Consequently, it is necessary to further perfect the scientific and technological social organizations resource acquisition process supervision, To establishin public service "supply and demand" procurement mechanism and evaluation system of scientific and technological social organizations, reduce government and scientific and technological social orgnizations "asymmetric dependence" relationship, and promote effective cooperation between scientific and technological social organizations, build a scientific, fair, standardized and highly efficient scientific and technological social organizations sustainable resource acquisition mode.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱 喆,徐顽强,曹胜亮.科技类社会组织资源获取模式评价——基于武汉市的实证研究[J].,2020,(19).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-28
  • 最后修改日期:2020-07-17
  • 录用日期:2020-08-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-10-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
关闭
关闭