“三评”改革两周年回顾：取得成效、存在问题与对策建议

The retrospection in the Second Anniversary of “Three Evaluation Mechanism Reform” Achievements、Existing Issues and Strategies

摘要:

在《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》印发实施两周年之际，总结分析有关项目评审、人才评价、机构评估（以下简称“三评”）改革取得的成效和存在问题。研究认为，“三评”改革已取得初步成效：精简人才“帽子”使人才称号回归学术性、荣誉性本质，更加合理设置各类科研项目和人才项目申报要求，优化项目评审制度，精简项目申报评审及后期管理流程等，但仍存在评价新标准尚未建立、评审专家公正参评缺乏健全保障机制、良好社会舆论环境尚未完全建立、基层机构推进“三评”改革进程参差不齐且整体缓慢、专业评价机构缺乏良好运行机制等问题制约“三评”改革的全面深入实施。基于此，提出推动“三评”改革工作全面深入贯彻实施相关建议：一是加强各方联动督查落实并及时总结推广经验做法，建立健全新评价标准体系；二是坚持分类治之、稳步持续推动；三是健全专家遴选及跟踪评价机制；四是加快配套制度改革，营造良好创新环境；五是加大对专业评价机构扶持力度并强化相应监管机制。

Abstract:

On the second anniversary of the issuance of the "Policy on Deepening Project Review, Talent Evaluation, and Institutional Evaluation Reforms", we will summarize and analyze the results and existing problems of the reforms related to project review, talent evaluation, and institutional evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the "Three Evaluations"). The study believes that the "three evaluations" reform has achieved initial results: streamlining the talent "hat" returns the title of talent to academic and honorary nature, more rationally setting various scientific research projects and talent project application requirements, optimizing the project review system, and streamlining project application Evaluation and later management processes, but there are still new evaluation standards that have not been established, evaluation experts’ fair participation in the evaluation lacks a sound guarantee mechanism, a good social public opinion environment has not been fully established, and the progress of the "three evaluations" reforms promoted by grassroots institutions is uneven and the overall slow and professional Problems such as the lack of a good operating mechanism for evaluation agencies restrict the comprehensive and in-depth implementation of the "three evaluations" reform. Based on this, it puts forward relevant recommendations to promote the comprehensive and in-depth implementation of the "Three Evaluations" reform work: First, strengthen the joint supervision and implementation of all parties, summarize and promote experience and practices in a timely manner, establish and improve a new evaluation standard system; second, adhere to classified governance and steady and continuous promotion ; The third is to improve the expert selection and follow-up evaluation mechanism; the fourth is to accelerate the reform of supporting systems to create a good innovation environment; the fifth is to increase support for professional evaluation institutions and strengthen the corresponding supervision mechanism.