基于科技奖励理论的高校科研奖励政策同质化与科研异化探究

Homogenization of University Scientific Research Reward Policy Based on Science and Technology Reward Research on Alienation with Scientific Research

摘要:

高校科研奖励政策本质是一种激励科研功利主义行为。其在生成、演化过程中所形成的“指标—量化—奖励”模式,存在奖励形式的一致性,奖励内容、依据的统一性等同质化问题,已严重脱离我国高校高质量发展和科技成果的内涵属性。它割裂科研内容和形式、混淆科研目的和手段、过程和结果的辩证统一关系,助推“常态”科研,偏离科研规律,异化科研求真创新的本质。其形成的“论文挂帅”,论文发表与论文引用、科研项目、科研获奖相互派生、放大的“马态效应”,加剧科研功利化,消解高校立德树人根本任务的完成,异化科研目标。并在奖励内容、奖励次数存在严重重复奖。应按照分类分阶段精准治理的思路,首先建立起以形式服从内容、手段服务目的以质量为导向的内涵评价体系,并切实解决科研评价中定量指标偏离质量属性的问题。要下决心克服“便利行政”的“赖政”行为,从思想深处走出“不以SCI等论文量化指标体系评价、奖励、激励科研,那以什么为标准？”伪命题的误区,尽快取消科研论文奖励,并逐步取消相关重复奖。

Abstract:

The nature of university research award policy is an act of stimulating scientific research utilitarianism. The "indicator-quantification-reward" model formed in the process of generation and evolution has problems of consistency in reward forms, and the uniformity of reward content and basis. It has been seriously separated from the high-quality development and scientific and technological achievements of Chinese universities. It divides the content and form of scientific research, confuses the dialectical and unified relationship of scientific research purposes and methods, processes and results, promotes "normal" scientific research, deviates from the law of scientific research, and alienates the essence of scientific research and innovation. The resulting "paper in command", the "Matthew Effect shment of the fundamental tasks of university leadership, and alienates scientific research goals. And there are serious duplicate awards in the reward content and the number of rewards. In accordance with the idea of categorized and staged precise governance, first establish a connotation evaluation system with form obeying content, means serving purpose and quality-oriented, and effectively solving the problem of quantitative indicators deviating from quality attributes in scientific research evaluation. We must be determined to overcome the "policy-dependent" behavior of "facilitating administration", and get out of the ideological depths of "not using SCI and other quantitative index systems to evaluate, reward, and encourage scientific research, what is the standard?" The false proposition should be eliminated as soon as possible, and gradually cancel related duplicate awards.