市场激励型环境规制的价值效应——基于碳排放权交易机制的研究
CSTR:
作者单位:

华北电力大学

基金项目:


The Value Effect of Market Incentive Environmental Regulation——A Study on Carbon Emission Trading
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [62]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探索市场激励型环境规制对绿色经济发展和企业价值增长的作用对于促进环境规制市场化和企业低碳发展至关重要。本文以2013年实施的碳排放权交易试点对市场激励型环境规制与企业价值的关系进行分析。结果表明:碳排放权交易机制的实施对企业短期价值有显著的积极影响,但抑制了长期价值。宏观层面上,随着碳市场流动性的提升,该机制的实施对企业短期价值的促进作用增强,对长期价值的消极影响也得到缓解。微观层面上,碳排放权交易机制对企业短期、长期价值在风险承受能力高的企业中均体现出更加显著的积极影响。本文研究结果丰富了市场激励型环境规制与企业价值研究的相关文献,为碳排放权交易机制的进一步完善提供了参考,给企业的绿色价值提升提供了思路。

    Abstract:

    To explore the role of market-incentive environmental regulation on the development of green economy and the growth of enterprise value is very important to promote the marketization of environmental regulation and the low-carbon development of enterprises. Based on the carbon emissions trading pilot project implemented in 2013, this paper analyzes the relationship between market incentive environmental regulation and enterprise value. The results show that the implementation of carbon emissions trading mechanism has a significant positive impact on the short-term value of enterprises, but suppresses the long-term value. At the macro level, with the improvement of the liquidity of the carbon market, the implementation of this mechanism can enhance the short-term value of enterprises and alleviate the negative impact on long-term value. At the micro level, the carbon emissions trading mechanism has a more significant positive impact on the short-term and long-term value of enterprises in enterprises with high risk tolerance. The research results of this paper enrich the relevant literature on market-incentive environmental regulation and enterprise value, provide a reference for the further improvement of carbon emissions trading mechanism, and provide ideas for enterprises to enhance the green value.

    参考文献
    [1]汪涛,叶元煦. 政府激励企业环境技术创新的初步研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 1998, (01): 80-83.
    [2]涂正革,谌仁俊. 排污权交易机制在中国能否实现波特效应?[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(07): 160-173.
    [3]Michael E Porter,Claas Van der Linde. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of economic perspectives, 1995, 9(4): 97-118.
    [4]Ronald H Coase, ''The problem of social cost'', in Classic papers in natural resource economicsSpringer, 1960), pp. 87-137.
    [5]何兴邦. 环境规制与城镇居民收入不平等——基于异质型规制工具的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2019, (06): 104-112.
    [6]A. Marcel Oestreich,Ilias Tsiakas. Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. Journal of Banking Finance, 2015, 58(SEP.): 294-308.
    [7]M. Lieberman,D. Montgomery. First-mover advantages[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9: 1–58.
    [8]Stefan Ambec,Mark A. Cohen,Stewart Elgie,等. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?[J]. Review of Environmental Economics Policy, 2013, 7(1): 2-22.
    [9]E. Porter Michael,van der Linde Claas. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4): 97-118.
    [10]Xiaoling Wang,Qinglong Shao. Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 660: 1346-1354.
    [11]Die Hu,Yuandi Wang,Jiashun Huang,等. How do different innovation forms mediate the relationship between environmental regulation and performance?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161(sep.10): 466-476.
    [12]Paul Lanoie,Jeremy Laurent-Lucchetti,Nick Johnstone,等. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 2011, 20(3): 803-842.
    [13]Pedro Ignacio Hancevic. Environmental regulation and productivity: The case of electricity generation under the CAAA-1990[J]. Energy Economics, 2016, 60: 131-143.
    [14]Tobias Stucki,Martin Woerter,Spyros Arvanitis,等. How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: A differentiated perspective[J]. Energy Policy, 2018, 114: 245-261.
    [15]Bj?rn Carlén,Anna Dahlqvist,Svante Mandell,等. EU ETS emissions under the cancellation mechanism - Effects of national measures[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 129: 816-825.
    [16]Natalia Fabra,Mar Reguant. Pass-Through of Emissions Costs in Electricity Markets[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(9): 2872-2899.
    [17]Ralf Martin,Mirabelle Mu?ls,Laure B. de Preux,等. Industry Compensation under Relocation Risk: A Firm-Level Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(8): 2482-2508.
    [18]Jan Abrell,Anta Ndoye Faye,Georg Zachmann. Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data, Bruegel working paper, 2011.
    [19]Vicente Medina,Pardo ángel,Pascual Roberto. The timeline of trading frictions in the European carbon market[J]. Energy Economics, 2014, 42: 378-394.
    [20]N Koch,G Grosjean,S Fuss. Politics matters: Regulatory events as catalysts for price formation under cap-and-trade[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2016, 78: 121-139.
    [21]M Ranson,R N Stavins. Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: Learning from experience[J]. Climate Policy, 2016, 16(3): 284-300.
    [22]B Doda,L Taschini. Carbon dating: When is it beneficial to link ETSs?[J]. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2017, 4(3): 701-730.
    [23]原毅军,刘柳. 环境规制与经济增长:基于经济型规制分类的研究[J]. 经济评论, 2013, (01): 27-33.
    [24]吴明琴,周诗敏,陈家昌. 环境规制与经济增长可以双赢吗——基于我国“两控区”的实证研究[J]. 当代经济科学, 2016, 38(06): 44-54+124.
    [25]史贝贝,冯晨,张妍,等. 环境规制红利的边际递增效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017, (12): 40-58.
    [26]龙小宁,万威. 环境规制、企业利润率与合规成本规模异质性[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017, (06): 155-174.
    [27]Wenjian He,Liangmin Tan,Zhiyong John Liu,等. Property rights protection, environmental regulation and corporate financial performance: Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 264: 121615.
    [28]Y. Guo,X. Xia,S. Zhang,等. Environmental Regulation, Government R D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4): 940-.
    [29]任胜钢,郑晶晶,刘东华,等. 排污权交易机制是否提高了企业全要素生产率——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, (05): 5-23.
    [30]齐红倩,陈苗. 中国排污权交易制度实现污染减排和绿色发展了吗?[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 40(03): 81-90.
    [31]Lian-Biao Cui,Ying Fan,Lei Zhu,等. How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target?[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 136: 1043-1052.
    [32]操群. 碳配额、碳排放交易对短期企业价值影响分析——基于我国碳交易试点省市不同标准的比较[J]. 财会通讯, 2015, (16): 33-35.
    [33]沈洪涛,黄楠. 碳排放权交易机制能提高企业价值吗[J]. 财贸经济, 2019, 40(01): 144-161.
    [34]Fenghua Wen,Nan Wu,Xu Gong. China''s carbon emissions trading and stock returns[J]. Energy Economics, 2020, 86: 104627.
    [35]Lei Zhu,Linju Chen,Xueying Yu,等. Buying green or producing green? Heterogeneous emitters’ strategic choices under a phased emission-trading scheme[J]. Resources, Conservation Recycling, 2018, 136: 223-237.
    [36]Ying Ma,Lihua Wang,Tao Zhang. Research on the Dynamic Linkage among the Carbon Emission Trading, Energy and Capital Markets[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020: 122717.
    [37]A Marcel Oestreich,Ilias Tsiakas. Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. Journal of Banking Finance, 2015, 58: 294-308.
    [38]Lawrence H Goulder,Marc AC Hafstead,Michael Dworsky. Impacts of alternative emissions allowance allocation methods under a federal cap-and-trade program[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics management, 2010, 60(3): 161-181.
    [39]Robin Smale,Murray Hartley,Cameron Hepburn,等. The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices[J]. Climate Policy, 2006, 6(1): 31-48.
    [40]Nicolas Koch,Alexander Bassen. Valuing the carbon exposure of European utilities. The role of fuel mix, permit allocation and replacement investments[J]. Energy Economics, 2013, 36: 431-443.
    [41]DENG Mao-Zhi,Wen-Xiu ZHANG. Recognition and analysis of potential risks in China''s carbon emission trading markets[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2019, 10(1): 30-46.
    [42]Kaile Zhou,Yiwen Li. Carbon finance and carbon market in China: Progress and challenges[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 214: 536-549.
    [43]Miao Zhang,Russell Gregory-Allen. Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the Chinese Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. Theoretical Economics Letters, 2018, 8(11): 2082.
    [44]苏亮瑜,谢晓闻. 全球碳排放权市场的风险防控及对我国的启示[J]. 南方金融, 2017, (04): 66-73.
    [45]Bob Litterman. What is the right price for carbon emissions[J]. Regulation, 2013, 36: 38.
    [46]Merrill Jones Barradale. Investment under uncertain climate policy: A practitioners? perspective on carbon risk[J]. Energy policy, 2014, 69: 520-535.
    [47]王竹泉,段丙蕾,王苑琢,等. 资本错配、资产专用性与公司价值——基于营业活动重新分类的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017, (03): 120-138.
    [48]邵帅,吕长江. 实际控制人直接持股可以提升公司价值吗?——来自中国民营上市公司的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (05): 134-146+188.
    [49]贾春香,王婉莹. 解读环境保护对企业财务绩效的影响——基于环境管理的调节效应[J]. 会计之友, 2018, (11): 93-97.
    [50]宋晓华,蒋潇,韩晶晶,等. 企业碳信息披露的价值效应研究——基于公共压力的调节作用[J]. 会计研究, 2019, (12): 78-84.
    [51]韩亮亮,李凯,宋力. 高管持股与企业价值——基于利益趋同效应与壕沟防守效应的经验研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2006, (04): 35-41.
    [52]史贝贝,冯晨,康蓉. 环境信息披露与外商直接投资结构优化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, (04): 98-116.
    [53]傅京燕,章扬帆,谢子雄. 制度设计影响了碳市场流动性吗——基于中国试点地区的研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2017, 38(08): 129-143.
    [54]Chris Florackis,Andros Gregoriou,Alexandros Kostakis. Trading frequency and asset pricing on the London Stock Exchange: Evidence from a new price impact ratio[J]. Journal of Banking Finance, 2011, 35(12): 3335-3350.
    [55]毛其淋,许家云. 政府补贴、异质性与企业风险承担 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016, 15(04): 1533-1562.
    [56]余明桂,李文贵,潘红波. 民营化、产权保护与企业风险承担[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(09): 112-124.
    [57]余明桂,李文贵,潘红波. 管理者过度自信与企业风险承担[J]. 金融研究, 2013, (01): 149-163.
    [58]何瑛,于文蕾,杨棉之. CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, (09): 155-173.
    [59]曾爱民,张纯,魏志华. 金融危机冲击、财务柔性储备与企业投资行为——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2013, (04): 107-120.
    [60]王爱群,唐文萍. 环境不确定性对财务柔性与企业成长性关系的影响研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2017, (03): 186-192.
    [61]张庆垒,施建军,刘春林. 技术多元化、冗余资源与企业绩效关系研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(11): 21-28.
    [62]王超发,郭宏,杨德林. 创新方式会影响企业投资价值吗?——基于冗余资源的调节效应验证[J]. 统计研究, 2020: 1-12.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李涛,李昂.市场激励型环境规制的价值效应——基于碳排放权交易机制的研究[J].,2021,(13).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:445
  • 下载次数: 55
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04
  • 最后修改日期:2020-11-20
  • 录用日期:2020-12-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-21
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!
关闭
关闭