Abstract:Based on the intellectual property(IP) law texts of the WIPO Lex database and the intellectual property litigation case data of the European Union Intellectual Property Office(EUIPO) database, we conducted IP research on intellectual property policy trends and litigation risks in the five countries along the China-Europe railway line, including the United Kingdom(UK), Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, and Italy, in terms of the quantitative classification of policy protection, policy implementation focus and its evolution, IP litigation case characteristics and hot spots. The results show that: (1) The number and intensity of the rule-based IP policies promulgated by the United Kingdom ranks first among the five countries, while the Netherlands has the lowest number of policies but relatively high policy protection strength. (2) In terms of the agencys of policy promulgation, all countries are involved many agencys, and a large number of relevant IP policies of the European Council and the European Parliament have been applied. (3) Patent, copyright and related rights policies are the key points of rule-based IP policies in the the UK; Germany attaches more importance to intellectual property and related enforcement laws; IP agencies and other policies, copyright and related rights, and the enforcement of IP related laws are the two major concerns of the Netherlands; IP regulatory agencies, copyright and related rights policies are the two major concerns of Poland; copyright and related rights , IP and related law enforcement, IP regulatory agencies, and geographical indication policies are the focus of Italy. (4) EU trademark litigations are the important area of IP litigations in the five countries. Among them, the UK has the highest compensation amount in litigation cases and the lowest in the Netherlands. The difference between the maximum and minimum amount of compensation in litigation cases in Germany ranks first among the five countries, and "infringement" and "likelihood of confusion " are the topics commonly involved in litigation cases in various countries. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that Chinese companies concerned should pay attention to the differences in the judicial system of the target countries, fully understand their IP laws and regulations, judicial practices as well as the EU laws and regulations that they follow, and work with experienced intellectual property lawyers or other professionals to formulate comprehensive and systematic IP protection strategies, do a good job in legal risk assessment and avoidance measures, and pay attention to understanding the basic strategies and techniques of carrying out IP litigations in the target market areas, and build a comprehensive intellectual property protection system.