同行评审作为科研项目评审立项过程中的核心环节,广泛地应用于中国各级科研计划的管理过程。但是,在“一带一路”国际科技合作项目的评审环节,仍然存在着评审效率较低的问题,表现为项目评审周期较长和评审费用支出较高的问题。本研究以“一带一路”国际科技合作项目投票打分情况为数据来源,利用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数整体定量衡量不同专家数量组合对同行评审的影响,并定量给出影响的特征值。据此进一步提出优化“一带一路”国际科技合作项目专家评审效率的建议。

Peer review, as the core mean in the process of scientific research project review and approval, is widely used in the management process at all levels in China. However, in the process of project review on "Belt and Road" International Science and Technology Cooperation Project, there are still problems of low efficiency, such as long project review cycle and high cost. This work studies the disputes employing spearman correlation on voting score of , giving the characteristic value of the influence of certain number of review experts. The numerical results suggest show that the number of evaluation experts still has the potential to be further optimized.

G301

国家社科基金一般项目“‘一带一路’倡议实施中的科技开放合作重点与难点研究”