考虑不同供给方式的产业共性技术市场化开发博弈分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

重庆工商大学工商管理学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F062.6

基金项目:

国家社科基金一般项目“双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发机制研究”(20BJY005)


Game Aanalysis on Marketization Development of Industrial Generic Technologies Considering Different Supply Models
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    借鉴Stackelberg主从博弈思想,考虑自我供给和外部供给方式,构建了共性技术市场化开发三阶段动态博弈模型,分析了不同供给方式下共性技术市场化开发影响因素及供给方式选择问题。研究表明:无论何种供给方式,企业的市场化开发努力、基于共性技术所研发的产品的最优销售价格和政府的经济收益总是相同,但市场化开发企业的收益在外部供给方式下更高;共性技术外部供给方式过度消耗了政府补贴资源,自我供给共性技术方式应该成为一种更利于节约公用资源的共性技术研发模式;顾客感知度及市场化开发的预期外部收益对企业付出市场化开发努力有较好的激励作用,对企业及政府收益有正向影响,而研发成本等因素对企业市场化开发努力行为产生负向影响。最后,根据研究结论从充分发挥市场和政府的调节引导作用、鼓励企业开展“自我供给式”的研发活动及引导多主体参与共性技术纵向协同研发等方面提出相关政策建议。

    Abstract:

    Based on Stackelberg"s Master-Slave game theory, considering the government subsidies and different sources of generic technology, the three-stage dynamic game model of generic technology marketization development is constructed, and the relevant factors such as marketization development of the industrial generic technology of different supply models are compared and studied under the government subsidies. The result shows that: no matter what the supply model is, the marketization development efforts of enterprises, the optimal sales price of products developed based on generic technology and the economic benefits of the government are always same, but the benefits of marketization development enterprises are higher under the external supply model; Under the external supply generic technology model, the government subsidized resources have been consumed excessively, and the self-supply generic technology model should become a more favorable mode of generic technology R D to save public resources; Customer perception and expected external benefits of marketization development have a good incentive effect on the enterprises" R D efforts, and have a positive impact on the enterprises" and government"s revenue, while R D costs and other factors have a negative impact on enterprises" R D efforts. Finally, according to the conclusions this paper puts forward some policy suggestions to promote the marketization development of generic technology from the aspects of giving full play to the regulation and inducement of the market and the government, encouraging enterprises to carry out “self-supply” R D activities and guiding multi-agent to participate in the vertical collaborative R D of generic technologies.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郑月龙,秦国静,刘思漫,周冰洁,蔡琴.考虑不同供给方式的产业共性技术市场化开发博弈分析[J].,2022,(3).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-20
  • 最后修改日期:2021-09-03
  • 录用日期:2021-09-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
关闭
关闭