21世纪国内外农业创新采用研究的知识图谱分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.西北大学 城市与环境学院;2.清华大学 公共管理学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目“农业科技园区创新扩散中新型经营主体的技术采用行为与机制研究”(41771129);国家自然科学基金青年项目“项目制影响下的村庄空间生产与治理——基于试点示范村的微观探察”(41601174);陕西省社会科学基金项目“陕西省果业专业合作社中的农户技术采用行为及技术扩散机制研究”(2015D055)


Agricultural innovation adoption research at home and abroad in the 21st century based on the Knowledge Mapping
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [71]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以中国知网数据库和WoS核心数据库为文献源,以2000—2020年农业创新采用领域文献为研究对象,借助SATI、Gephi及CiteSpace软件构建知识图谱,系统分析国内外农业创新采用研究的文献特征、核心力量、合作网络及研究热点。结果显示:(1)农业创新采用领域的文献产出呈指数增长态势,国内文献增长速度较快但规模稍逊;多学科交叉特征明显,《中国农村经济》和Agricultural Economics是代表性刊物。(2)美国是该领域的领先国;农业院校和科研机构是主要力量;Qaim M和张俊飚是高产作者;(3)国家合作网络以美国、德国、澳大利亚等国为核心,国外机构、作者合作网络发达且联系紧密,国内机构、作者合作网络松散且互动不足。(4)事前评估、决策行为及事后评价是主要议题,国外研究日臻成熟但深入空间有限,国内研究日趋全面但仍需突破创新。(5)国外农业创新采用研究呈现出视角纵深化、方法创新化、技术集成化的发展趋势,国内虽已呈现出视角拓展化、方法多样化、主体多元化的发展态势,但整体仍滞后于国外,研究深度及广度有待提高,新型经营主体是未来需重点关注的对象。

    Abstract:

    Taking CNKI database and WoS core database as the source of literature, taking the literature in the field of agricultural innovation adoption from 2000 to 2020 as the object, this paper systematically analyzes the literature characteristics, core forces, cooperation networks and research hotspots of agricultural innovation adoption research based on the knowledge mapping constructed by SATI, Gephi and CiteSpace. The results show that: (1) the literature output in the field of agricultural innovation adoption shows an exponential growth trend, both at home and abroad. The domestic related literature has a faster growth rate but a smaller scale than foreign literature. Agricultural innovation adoption is a multi-interdisciplinary field intersected by agriculture, economy, management science and resources science. Chinese Rural Economy and Agricultural Economics are representative journals at home and abroad respectively. (2) The United States is the leading country in this field. Agricultural colleges and research institutions are the main force in this field. Qaim M and Zhang Junbiao are high-output authors. (3) The national cooperation network is centered on the United States, Germany, Australia and other countries. The cooperation networks of foreign institutions and authors are developed and closely connected, while that of domestic institutions and authors are loose and lack of interaction. (4) Ex-ante assessment, decision-making behavior and ex-post evaluation are the main topics in the field of agricultural innovation adoption. Foreign research is becoming increasingly mature, but the space for in-depth research is limited. Domestic research is becoming more and more comprehensive, but more breakthroughs and innovations are needed. (5) The foreign research on agricultural innovation adoption has shown a development trend of continuous deepening of perspectives, continuous innovation of approaches, and continuous integration of technologies. Although domestic research has shown a trend of expanding perspectives, diversifying methods and subjects, it still lags behind foreign research as a whole and needs to be improved in terms of research depth and breadth. The new business entities are the objects that need to be focused on in the future.

    参考文献
    [1] 蒋和平,苏基才.1995—1999年全国农业科技进步贡献率的测定与分析[J].农业技术经济, 2001(5): 12-17.
    [2] 黄季焜,胡瑞法,孙振玉.让科学技术进入农村的千家万户——建立新的农业技术推广创新体系[J].农业经济问题,2000(4):17-25.
    [3] Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change[J]. Econometrica, 1957, 25: 501-522.
    [4] Doss C R. Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: Limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2006, 34(3): 207-219.
    [5] 龙冬平,李同昇,于正松.农业技术扩散中的农户采用行为研究:国外进展与国内趋势[J].地域研究与开发,2014,33(5): 132-139.
    [6] 朱萌,张兴中,沈祥成,等.农户农业技术采用行为研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(11):224-234.
    [7] 曾杨梅,张俊飚,何可,等.农户农业技术采用现状、影响因素与对策:一篇文献综述[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(1): 119-123.
    [8] 王克强,黄智俊,张永良.农户节水灌溉技术采用行为研究综述[J].经济体制改革,2006(4):180-184.
    [9] 曹树金,吴育冰,韦景竹,等.知识图谱研究的脉络、流派与趋势——基于SSCI与CSSCI期刊论文的计量与可视化[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2015, 41(5):16-34.
    [10] 刘启元,叶鹰.文献题录信息挖掘技术方法及其软件SATI的实现——以中外图书情报学为例[J].信息资源管理学报,2012,2(1):50-58.
    [11] Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks, California, May 17-20, 2009[C]. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Medias, 2009:361-362.
    [12] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.
    [13] 孙威,毛凌潇.基于CiteSpace方法的京津冀协同发展研究演化[J].地理学报,2018,73(12): 2378-2391.
    [14] Midingoyi S K G, Kassie M, Muriithi B, et al. Do farmers and the environment benefit from adopting integrated pest management practices? Evidence from Kenya[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2019, 70(2): 452-470.
    [15] Wainaina P, Tongruksawattana S, Qaim M. Tradeoffs and complementarities in the adoption of improved seeds, fertilizer, and natural resource management technologies in Kenya[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2016, 47(3): 351- 362.
    [16] Wossen T, Alene A, Abdoulaye T, et al. Agricultural technology adoption and household welfare: measurement and evidence[J]. Food Policy, 2019, 87: 101742.
    [17] 蒋琳莉,张露,张俊飚,等.稻农低碳生产行为的影响机理研究——基于湖北省102户稻农的深度访谈[J].中国农村观察, 2018(4): 86-101.
    [18] 朱萌,齐振宏,罗丽娜,等.不同类型稻农保护性耕作技术采纳行为影响因素实证研究——基于湖北、江苏稻农的调查数据[J].农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(4): 624-629.
    [19] 贺志武,胡伦,陆迁.农户风险偏好、风险认知对节水灌溉技术采用意愿的影响[J].资源科学,2018,40(4): 797-808.
    [20] 王静,霍学喜.农户技术选择对其生产经营收入影响的空间溢出效应分析——基于全国七个苹果主产省的调查数据[J].中国农村经济,2015(1):31-43.
    [21] 满明俊,李同昇,李树奎,等.技术环境对西北传统农区农户采用新技术的影响分析——基于三种不同属性农业技术的调查研究[J].地理科学,2010, 30(1): 66-74.
    [22] 侯国林,黄震方,台运红,等. 旅游与气候变化研究进展[J].生态学报,2015, 35(9): 2837-2847.
    [23] Khatri-Chhetri A, Aggarwal P K, Joshi P K, et al. Farmers'' prioritization of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) technologies[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2017, 151: 184-191.
    [24] Lalani B, Dorward P, Holloway G, et al. Smallholder farmers'' motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 146:80-90.
    [25] Channa H, Chen A Z, Pina P, et al.What drives smallholder farmers'' willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya[J]. Food Policy, 2019, 85: 64-71.
    [26] Hyland J J, Heanue K, McKillop J, et al. Factors underlying farmers'' intentions to adopt best practices: The case of paddock based grazing systems[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2018, 162: 97-106.
    [27] Faisal M, Xia C P, Akhtar S, et al. Modeling smallholder livestock herders'' intentions to adopt climate smart practices: An extended theory of planned behavior[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020,27: 39105-39122.
    [28] Oyinbo O, Chamberlin J, Vanlauwe B, et al. Farmers'' pReferences for high-input agriculture supported by site-specific extension services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2019, 173: 12-26.
    [29] Quang D V, Schreinemachers P, Berger T. Ex-ante assessment of soil conservation methods in the uplands of Vietnam: An agent-based modeling approach[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2014, 123:108-119.
    [30] Bizimana J C, Richardson J W. Agricultural technology assessment for smallholder farms: An analysis using a farm simulation model (FARMSIM)[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 156:406-425.
    [31] Turinawe A, Mugisha J, Drake L. Soil and water conservation agriculture in subsistence systems: determinants of adoption in southwestern Uganda[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation. 2015, 70,133-142.
    [32] Hunecke C, Engler A, Jara-Rojas R, et al. Understanding the role of social capital in adoption decisions: An application to irrigation technology[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2017, 153:221-231.
    [33] Feike T, Khor L Y, Mamitimin Y, et al. Determinants of cotton farmers'' irrigation water management in arid Northwestern China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 187:1-10.
    [34] Dill M D, Emvalomatis G, Saatkamp H, et al. Factors affecting adoption of economic management practices in beef cattle production in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015, 42(1):21-28.
    [35] Marra M, Pannell D J, Ghadim A A. The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2003, 75(2-3):215-234.
    [36] Mottaleb K A, Krupnik T J, Erenstein O. Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 46:155-168.
    [37] Rose D C, Sutherland W J, Parker C, et al. Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 149:165-174.
    [38] Bodnar F, De Graaff J. Factors influencing adoption of soil and water conservation measures in southern Mali[J]. Land Degradation Development, 2003, 14(6):515-525.
    [39] Deressa T T, Hassan R M, Ringler C, et al. Determinants of farmers'' choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia[J]. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimesions, 2009, 19(2):248-255.
    [40] Putra A R S, Pedersen S M, Liu Z. Biogas diffusion among small scale farmers in Indonesia: An application of duration analysis[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 86:399-405.
    [41] Gao Y, Zhao D Y, Yu L L, et al. Duration analysis on the adoption behavior of green control techniques[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(7):6319-6327.
    [42] Manda J, Khonje M J, Alene A D, et al. Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 158:120160.
    [43] Lambrecht I, Vanlauwe B, Merckx R, et al. Understanding the Process of Agricultural Technology Adoption: Mineral Fertilizer in Eastern DR Congo[J]. World Development, 2014,59:132-146.
    [44] Tang J, Folmer H, Xue J. Adoption of farm-based irrigation water-saving techniques in the Guanzhong Plain, China. Agricultural Economics, 2016,47(4):445-455.
    [45] Teklewold H, Gebrehiwot T, Bezabih M. Climate smart agricultural practices and gender differentiated nutrition outcome: An empirical evidence from Ethiopia[J]. World Development, 2019, 122:38-53.
    [46] Tesfaye W, Tirivayi N. The impacts of postharvest storage innovations on food security and welfare in Ethiopia[J]. Food Policy, 2018, 75:52-67.
    [47] Araya T, Nyssen J, Govaerts B, et al. Seven years resource-conserving agriculture effect on soil quality and crop productivity in the Ethiopian drylands[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016, 163:99-109.
    [48] Kassie M, Marenya P, Tessema Y, et al. Measuring Farm and Market Level Economic Impacts of Improved Maize Production Technologies in Ethiopia: Evidence from Panel Data[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2017, 69(1):76-95.
    [49] Kimaro A A, Mpanda M, Rioux J, et al. Is conservation agriculture ''climate-smart'' for maize farmers in the highlands of Tanzania?[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2015, 105(3):217-228.
    [50] Khonje M G, Julius M, Petros M, et al. Adoption and welfare impacts of multiple agricultural technologies: evidence from eastern Zambia[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2018, 49(5):599-609.
    [51] Griffin T W, Miller N J, Bergtold J, et al. Farm'' s sequence of adoption of information-intensive precision agricultural technology[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2017, 33(4):521-527.
    [52] 宋金田,祁春节.农户农业技术需求影响因素分析——基于契约视角[J].中国农村观察,2013(6):52-59+94.
    [53] 王浩,刘芳.农户对不同属性技术的需求及其影响因素分析——基于广东省油茶种植业的实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2012(1):53-64.
    [54] 展进涛,陈超.劳动力转移对农户农业技术选择的影响——基于全国农户微观数据的分析[J].中国农村经济,2009(3): 75-84.
    [55] 西爱琴,朱广印,吴敬学.农户科学储粮技术认知与采用意愿研究——基于山东省的实证分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(5):82-88.
    [56] 霍瑜,张俊飚,陈祺琪,等.土地规模与农业技术利用意愿研究——以湖北省两型农业为例[J].农业技术经济,2016(7):19-28.
    [57] 黄炜虹,齐振宏,邬兰娅,等.农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定:市场收益还是政策激励?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8):69-77.
    [58] 盖豪,颜廷武,张俊飚.基于分层视角的农户环境友好型技术采纳意愿研究——以秸秆还田为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2018, 23(4):170-182.
    [59] 杨志海.老龄化、社会网络与农户绿色生产技术采纳行为——来自长江流域六省农户数据的验证[J].中国农村观察,2018(4):44-58.
    [60] 乔丹,陆迁,徐涛.社会网络、推广服务与农户节水灌溉技术采用——以甘肃省民勤县为例[J].资源科学,2017,39(3): 441-450.
    [61] 李卫,薛彩霞,姚顺波,等.农户保护性耕作技术采用行为及其影响因素: 基于黄土高原476户农户的分析[J].中国农村经济,2017(1):44-57.
    [62] 韩青,谭向勇.农户灌溉技术选择的影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2004(1):63-69.
    [63] 廖西元,王磊,王志刚,等.稻农采用节水技术影响因素的实证分析——自然因素和经济因素效应及其交互影响的估测[J].中国农村经济,2006(12):13-19.
    [64] 王艳,周曙东.花生种植户机械化技术采纳行为实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014, 14(5):106-112.
    [65] 廖西元,王磊,王志刚,等.稻农采用机械化生产技术的影响因素实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2006(6):43-48.
    [66] 胡伦,陆迁.干旱风险冲击下节水灌溉技术采用的减贫效应——以甘肃省张掖市为例[J].资源科学, 2018,40(2):417-426.
    [67] 冯晓龙,刘明月,霍学喜,等. 农户气候变化适应性决策对农业产出的影响效应——以陕西苹果种植户为例[J].中国农村经济,2017(3):31-45.
    [68] 黄炎忠,罗小锋,唐林,等.绿色防控技术的节本增收效应——基于长江流域水稻种植户的调查[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(10):174-184.
    [69] 李想.农户可持续生产技术采用的集成效应研究[J].统计与信息论坛, 2015, 30(10):79-84.
    [70] 张标,张领先,傅泽田,等.新型农业经营主体节水灌溉技术采纳行为及其影响因素研究——以北京市为例[J].农业现代化研究, 2017, 38(6): 987-994.
    [71] 高杨,赵端阳,于丽丽.家庭农场绿色防控技术政策偏好与补偿意愿[J].资源科学,2019, 41(10): 1837-1848.作者简介:晁? 静(1993-),女,陕西宝鸡人,博士生,主要研究方向:农业园区技术扩散与采用研究;李同昇(1960-),通讯作者,男,陕西宝鸡人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向:农业技术扩散与农区发展研究;王昭,(1990-),女,博士,主要研究方向:农业园区创新扩散与采用研究;杨东迪,(1995-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:区域发展与空间规划研究联系方式:晁静,18209227175,陕西省西安市长安区学府大道1号西北大学南校区,710127
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

晁静,李同昇,王昭,杨东迪.21世纪国内外农业创新采用研究的知识图谱分析[J].,2022,(12).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:358
  • 下载次数: 47
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-12
  • 最后修改日期:2022-06-19
  • 录用日期:2022-01-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-01
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!
关闭
关闭