高校科研成果非学术影响评估的比较研究——基于对美、英、荷三国科研评估框架的考察

An International Comparative Study on Evaluation Frameworks of ‘Impact’ of Scientific Research Based on Practices of the U.S., the U.K, and the Netherlands

摘要:

本研究采用比较研究的方法，从评估目标、评估方法、评估标准、评估流程等维度对美英荷三国近年来所开展的非学术影响评估进行了系统考察，基于从国际比较中获得的经验，为我国高校探索科研评估制度改革与创新提出了三点启示：第一，引入非学术影响评估，构建充满活力的科研生态体系；第二，进一步优化评估方案，强化非学术影响评估的社会价值导向功能；第三，开展多维度的元评估，营造并形成良好的评估文化。

Abstract:

This study systematically investigates the non-academic impact assessment carried out by the United States, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands from the dimensions of assessment objectives, assessment methods, assessment standards and assessment processes. Based on the international practices, this study proposes three recommendations towards our existing evaluation framework of subjects in higher education institutions in China. First, the dimension of ‘non-academic impact’ of scientific research should be included to contribute to more diverse and vital research environment. Second, The evaluation scheme should be further optimized to strengthen the guiding function of ‘non-academic impact’ evaluation; Third, meta-evaluation is encouraged to be conducted to facilitate better evaluation culture.