四螺旋视角下区域绿色技术创新效率提升路径——基于中国内地30个省市的QCA分析

Promotion Path of Regional Green Technology Innovation Efficiency from The Perspective of Quadruple Helix: QCA analysis based on 30 Provinces in China

摘要:

绿色技术创新作为平衡经济增长与生态环境保护的重要支点,其效率的高低已经成为影响我国经济高质量发展的重要因素。文章通过超效率EBM模型,利用2019年省际截面数据,测算了我国内地30个省市的绿色技术创新效率,并基于四螺旋模型,探究政府、产业、高校、社会公众协同绿色技术创新机制,选取政府支持、环境规制、产业结构优化度、高校技术转移、公众参与度五个前因条件,运用模糊集定性比较分析方法探究多主体协同联动产生区域高绿色技术创新效率的路径,研究发现：单个条件对绿色技术创新效率的解释力度不强,但相较于其他条件,政府支持与公众参与在促进区域绿色技术创新效率提升方面发挥重要作用；存在3条提升区域绿色技术创新效率的关键路径,包括政产学协同型、政府助力下的产业推动型、政府主导逻辑下的公众参与型；两条导致非高绿色技术创新效率的路径,均呈现政府支持乏力与公众参与缺失的特点。

Abstract:

As an important fulcrum of balancing economic growth and ecological environment protection, the efficiency of green technology innovation has become an important factor affecting the high-quality development of China"s economy. Based on the super efficiency EBM model and the provincial cross-sectional data in 2019, this paper calculates the green technology innovation efficiency of 30 provinces and cities in mainland China, explores the collaborative green technology innovation mechanism of government, industry, universities and the public based on the Quadruple helix model, and selects five antecedents: government support, environmental regulation, industrial structure optimization, university technology transfer and public participation, Using the qualitative comparative analysis method of fuzzy set, this paper explores the path of multi-agent collaborative linkage to produce regional high green technology innovation efficiency. It is found that: the explanation of green technology innovation efficiency by single condition is not strong, but compared with other conditions, government support and public participation play an important role in promoting the efficiency of regional green technology innovation; There are three key paths to improve the efficiency of regional green technology innovation, including government property science coordination, industry promotion with the help of the government and public participation under the government led logic; The two paths leading to the efficiency of non high green technology innovation are characterized by weak government support and lack of public participation.