Abstract:In view of the current research on ambidextrous innovation, there is no unified theoretical perspective to summarize the difficulty of different trigger factors of ambidexterous innovation. Based on the resource-based view, from the three perspectives of executive advantage integration, resource utilization, and organizational learning, this paper analyzes the situation in China. 60 empirical studies on ambidextrous innovation are sorted out and meta-analyzed, and the degree of influence of the three dimensions on exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation is analyzed in depth. Clarify the influencing factors and mechanism of dual innovation in the Chinese context. The results show that: in the Chinese context, the integration of executive advantages, resource utilization, and organizational learning can significantly promote organizational ambidexterity innovation, and their promotion strength increases in turn; under all conditions, compared with exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation is stronger. It is easy to be triggered because exploitative innovation can be realized through resource integration, which is in line with China’s reverse path from industrialization to technology; measurement tools and regional economic levels can significantly adjust the above-mentioned triggering process of organizational dual innovation, while industry attributes can only adjust The process by which exploratory innovation is triggered. To this end, enterprises should pay more attention to the improvement of organizational learning capabilities, and at the same time dialectically view exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation to achieve a balanced development of the two; in addition, the government and enterprises themselves should pay attention to factors such as regional economic level and industry attributes to promote innovation .