社会治理智能化进程中的算法歧视、社会关系异变与权力结构失衡等现象极易诱发利益冲突，具体包括正向冲突和逆向冲突两种，需要系统规范的法律程式以应对复杂的社会冲突。为此可尝试进行妥协式的纾困治理，对以人工智能本体、直接客体和间接客体构成的三维空间进行分层规划，同时树立社会冲突治理的整体观，强调传统规制的主导地位，建构应对社会冲突的综合性治理方略，最后辅之以技术理性确保法律可以将未来人类社会必需而又充满肆意的智能技术关入规制的“牢笼”之中。

In the intelligent process of social governance, algorithm discrimination, social relationship changes, power structure imbalance and other phenomena easily lead to conflict of interest, including positive conflict and reverse conflict. Systematic and standardized legal procedures are required to deal with complex social conflicts. To this end, we can try to carry out a compromise type of rescue governance. We can plan the three-dimensional space composed of artificial intelligence ontology, direct objects and indirect objects hierarchically. At the same time, we can establish a holistic view of social conflict governance, emphasize the dominant position of traditional regulations, and build a comprehensive governance strategy to deal with social conflicts, Finally, it is supplemented by technical rationality to ensure that the law can lock the necessary and wanton intelligent technology of the future human society into the cage of regulation.

D915.4

江苏省高校哲学社会科学重大项目“民生目标实现的区域协调发展行政法律措施”（2018SJZDA004）；