跨界搜寻、资源拼凑对持续性竞争优势的影响：基于资源编排理论

The Impact of Boundary-Spanning and Resource Bricolage on The Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Based on Resource Arrangement Theory

摘要:

跨界搜寻、资源拼凑对持续性竞争优势均有重要作用,但现阶段尚缺少两者复合驱动持续性竞争优势内在机制的理论探索与证据。本文从机会开发视角切入,基于资源编排理论,构建了跨界搜寻、资源拼凑对新创科技企业持续性竞争优势的作用机理模型,检验了速度型与品质型两种机会开发模式在这一影响过程中的中介作用,以及双元领导风格的差异化权变作用。通过对我国新创科技企业样本数据实证检验,结果表明：(1)跨界搜寻与资源拼凑均正向影响持续性竞争优势,且二者对持续性竞争优势的影响呈互补效应；(2)速度型机会开发与品质型机会开发正向影响持续性竞争优势,并均在跨界搜寻与资源拼凑影响持续性竞争优势过程中发挥中介作用。同时发现,跨界搜寻倾向于品质型机会开发模式获取持续性竞争优势,资源拼凑倾向于速度型机会开发模式获取持续性竞争优势；(3)跨界搜寻影响两种机会开发模式过程中,变革型领导风格发挥了差异化调节作用,交易型领导风格发挥了负向调节效应；相反,资源拼凑影响两种机会开发模式过程中,交易型领导风格发挥了差异化调节作用,变革型领导风格调节作用不显著。研究结论为我国新创科技企业构筑持续性竞争优势、有针对性地开展创业活动提供了匹配性理论指导和针对性实践启示。

Abstract:

Boundary-spanning search and resource bricolage play an important role in the sustainable competitive advantage, however, at this stage, there is still a lack of theoretical explanation and evidence for the internal mechanism of the two driving sustainable competitive advantage. From the perspective of opportunity development, based on the theory of resource arrangement, this paper constructs a mechanism model of the impact of boundary-spanning search and resource patching on the sustainable competitive advantage of new technology enterprises, and verifies the intermediary role of the speed type and quality type of opportunity development models in this impact process, as well as the differential contingency role of dual leadership styles. Based on the empirical test of sample data of China"s new high-tech enterprises, the results show that: (1) Boundary-spanning search and resource bricolage both positively affect sustainable competitive advantage, and the effects of the two on sustainable competitive advantage are complementary; (2) Speed based opportunity development and quality based opportunity development positively affect sustainable competitive advantage, and both play an intermediary role in the process of boundary-spanning search and resource bricolage affecting sustainable competitive advantage. At the same time, it is found that boundary-spanning search is more inclined to quality type opportunity development model to obtain sustainable competitive advantage, and resource bricolage is more inclined to speed type opportunity development model to obtain sustainable competitive advantage; (3) In the process of cross-border search influencing the two modes of opportunity development, transformational leadership style has played a differential role and transactional leadership style has played a negative role; On the contrary, in the process of resource pooling affecting the two modes of opportunity development, transactional leadership style played a differential role in regulating, while transformational leadership style did not play a significant role in regulating. The research conclusion provides a matching theoretical guidance and targeted practical enlightenment for China"s new technology enterprises to build sustainable competitive advantages and carry out targeted entrepreneurial activities.