企业与高校协同创新的制度逻辑冲突解决机制 —以华为与X大学的联合研究中心为例
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

南京大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F273

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目“领军企业创新链的组织架构与协同管理”(71732002);国家自然科学基金重点项目“后疫情时代的企业战略管理与数字化转型”(72132005);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“基于多主体仿真的领军企业创新链结构优化研究”(2020M671446)。


Institutional logic conflict resolution mechanism of collaborative innovation between enterprises and universities: Take the joint research center between Huawei and X University as an example
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以企业为主体开展产学研协同创新,有益于促进产学研用深入融合。在企业与高校协同创新中,企业能否有效解决自身与高校之间的制度逻辑冲突,直接影响着协同效果好坏。目前,缺乏文献解读企业如何解决自身与高校之间的制度逻辑冲突问题。研究通过对华为与X大学的联合研究中心展开分析,探讨了企业与高校协同创新的制度逻辑冲突解决机制。研究发现,企业与高校协同创新的制度逻辑冲突得以解决,是二者共同构建结构混合逻辑下自治组织单元的结果。在自治组织单元内部,企业与高校协商设计了分情景确定主导逻辑、主导逻辑保障少数逻辑利益、少数逻辑支持主导逻辑地位3种机制以确保组织单元的有效运行。研究结论丰富了以企业为主体的产学研协同创新研究,并扩展了制度逻辑理论中结构混合方案的研究,同时对企业与高校的协同创新实践具有启示。

    Abstract:

    Taking enterprises as the main body to carry out industry-university-research collaborative innovation is beneficial to promoting the deep integration of industry-university-research and application. In the collaborative innovation between enterprises and universities, whether enterprises can effectively solve the institutional logic conflict between themselves and universities directly affects the quality of the collaborative effect. At present, there is a lack of literature on how to solve the institutional logic conflict between enterprises and universities. By analyzing the joint research center of Huawei and X University, the paper discusses the institutional logic conflict resolution mechanism of collaborative innovation between enterprises and universities. It is found that the resolution of the institutional logic conflict of collaborative innovation between enterprises and universities is the result of their joint construction of autonomous organizational units under the mixed logic structure. Within the autonomous organizational unit, the enterprise and the university design three kinds of mechanisms through consultation, namely, determining the dominant logic by situation, protecting the interests of the minority logic, and supporting the dominant logic position to ensure the effective operation of the organizational unit. The research conclusions enrich the collaborative innovation research of industry-university-research with enterprises as the main body, and expand the research of structural mixed schemes in the system logic theory, and have implications for the collaborative innovation practice of enterprises and universities.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邵记友,杨忠.企业与高校协同创新的制度逻辑冲突解决机制 —以华为与X大学的联合研究中心为例[J].,2023,(17).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-02
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-09
  • 录用日期:2023-04-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
关闭
关闭