高校专利质量研究与分级管理实践——以一流大学建设42所高校为例

Research on University Patent Quality and Graded Management Practices: :Taking 42 Universities under the Construction of First-Class Universities as an Example.

摘要:

［研究目的］新时代知识产权强国建设背景下，高校对知识产权管理的需求日益增长，本文旨在探讨并构建专利质量评价的模型，进行实证研究，以期对高校科研管理提供有益抓手、为提升高校专利转移转化效率提供一些启示。［研究方法］结合现有专利质量评价研究，探讨并构建包含多维度的专利质量评价体系，利用该模型对中国的全量专利数据进行了计算，根据整体跑分数据，制定了专利质量分级策略。以“一流大学建设”的42所高校为研究对象，创建专利质量评价数据集，并对其专利进行评分，得出并分析高效专利质量分级数据；采用专利审查员引用数据进行高校专利H指标计算，将高校专利质量分级数据和专利h指数进行模型验证，探讨高校专利H指数和本研究专利质量分级之间的相关性。［研究结论］经过实证分析，构建的专利质量评价模型在高校专利质量分级管理方面具有一定的有效性和便捷性。一定条件下，本研究的高校专利质量分级表现基本符合高校名次和H指数表现，由于H指数有一定自限性，在比较专利数据量差异较大的高校时采用本研究的分级数据相对合理一些，可以避免单纯依专利据数量进行判断，为高校分级管理工作提供参考。

Abstract:

In the context of building a strong intellectual property country in the new era, the demand for intellectual property management in universities is increasing. This paper aims to explore and construct a patent quality evaluation model and conduct empirical research, in order to provide useful insights for university research management and improve the efficiency of patent transfer and transformation. By combining existing research on patent quality evaluation, a multidimensional patent quality evaluation system was constructed, and the full amount of Chinese patent data was calculated using this model. Based on the overall score data, a patent quality grading strategy was formulated. Taking the 42 universities involved in the "Double First-Class" initiative as research objects, a patent quality evaluation dataset was created and their patents were evaluated, and the high-efficiency patent quality grading data were analyzed. Using patent examiner citation data, the university patent quality grading data and patent H-index were verified, and the correlation between university patent H-index and patent quality grading in this study was explored. Through empirical analysis, the patent quality evaluation model constructed in this study has certain validity and convenience in university patent quality grading management. Under certain conditions, the university patent quality grading performance in this study is basically in line with university rankings and H-index performance. Due to the self-limitation of H-index, when comparing universities with significantly different patent data volumes, using the grading data in this study is relatively reasonable, which can avoid simply relying on the quantity of patents for judgment and provide some reference for university grading management work.