政策“工具-目标”下的中韩数字经济政策对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Digital Economy Policies between China and South Korea under the Policy "Instrument-Objective" Approach

摘要:

数字经济已经成为推动世界经济增长的主要引擎之一，从多维度关注并对比发达国家数字经济政策，能够为我国数字经济发展提供重要支撑。以中国和韩国2004年9月-2023年6月颁布的数字经济相关政策文件为研究样本，从政策“工具－目标”视角出发，综合运用Python语言和Nvivo12软件，基于文本计量分析方法，深入分析对比中韩两国数字经济政策特征。研究发现：（1）中韩两国虽然在政策主题方面都重视投入基础设施、技术、数据等要素，但中国更关注资源整合、数字化治理能力的提升，而韩国则侧重于通过投资引导推动各产业的数字化发展；（2）两国在政策工具维度方面也有所不同，中国缺乏需求面政策工具的使用，韩国则缺乏环境面政策工具的使用；（3）政策目标维度方面中韩两国也呈现出明显的差异，中国以基础设施、目标规划和组织领导支撑产业数字化和数字化治理，韩国则以技术支持、技术创新和安全监管推动数字产业化和数据价值化。基于上述政策建议，为推动我国数字经济高质量发展，建议适时调整政策目标，优化政策工具组合，深化产学研合作，强化数字化治理能力，推动产业数字化转型，加强人才培养和引进。通过构建完善的数字经济政策体系，激发数字经济新动能，实现经济社会可持续发展。

Abstract:

The digital economy has emerged as a primary driver of global economic growth. Conducting a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the digital economic policies of developed countries, from various perspectives, can offer valuable insights to support China's digital economy development. This study utilizes policy documents related to the digital economy issued by China and Republic of Korea from September 2004 to June 2023 as research samples. Employing Python language and Nvivo12 software, along with text econometric analysis method, this paper deeply examines and compares the characteristics of digital economy policies between China and Republic of Korea from the "instrument-target" perspective. The key findings are as follows: (1) While both countries emphasize investment in infrastructure, technology, data, and other factors in their policy themes, China focuses more on resource integration and enhancing digital governance capabilities, whereas Republic of Korea concentrates on promoting digital development across various industries through investment guidance; (2) There are also differences in terms of policy tools between the two countries - China lacks demand-side policy tools while Republic of Korea lacks environment-side policy tools; (3) In terms of policy objectives, there are distinct disparities between China and Republic of Korea - China supports industrial digitization and digital governance through infrastructure investment planning and organizational leadership, while Republic of Korea promotes digital industrialization and data value through technical support, technological innovation, and safety supervision. Based on these findings, it is recommended that in order to promote high-quality development of China's digital economy adjustments should be made to policy objectives in a timely manner; optimization should be done regarding the combination of policy tools; industry-university-research cooperation should be deepened; efforts should be made to strengthen digital governance capabilities; industrial digitization transformation should be promoted; talent training & introduction need strengthening. By establishing a robust system for digital economy policies we will stimulate new drivers for the sector leading towards sustainable economic & social development.