面向关键核心技术的创新联合体合作策略研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

西北工业大学 管理学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社科基金一般项目(22BGL011):新型举国体制下关键核心技术突破的影响机理及实施路径研究; 陕西软科学研究计划一般项目(2023-CX-RKX-120):面向关键核心技术的陕西省创新联合体发展模式及演化路径研究


Research on the cooperation strategy of innovation consortium oriented to key core technologies
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    组建面向关键核心技术的创新联合体是实现关键核心技术攻关的重要途径。本文从实践角度出发,构建了以龙头企业、政府、由中小企业和高校、院所构成的其他合作主体为主体的关键因素模型和理论模型。在此基础上引入三方演化博弈模型,研究了三方主体的稳定性策略选择,并以面向陕西省光子产业的创新联合体为案例,对博弈模型展开数值仿真分析。研究结果显示:龙头企业的初始合作意愿越高及收益分配占比越大对各方主体策略选择有积极影响;政府的前期奖励与后期监督都能为面向关键核心技术的创新联合体合作降低成本,各方主体的合作意愿随支持力度增强而提高;其他合作主体在合作中受龙头企业影响较大,龙头企业能否诚信发挥牵头作用直接影响着其他合作主体的收益与未来合作意愿。

    Abstract:

    With the improvement of the demand for the completeness of the industrial chain and innovation chain, it is more and more important for the state to master the key core technologies in the chain. In order to make full use of the innovation forces and innovation resources scattered in all walks of life in the past and accelerate the solution of the problem of key core technologies being controlled by others, many provinces and cities in China have actively explored the formation of innovation consortia for key core technologies in recent years. However, there is no mature theoretical system to support it in China, and there is a lack of goal-oriented research on key core technologies of local characteristic industries and analysis of dynamic changes in cooperation strategies. In view of these shortcomings, this paper constructs a theoretical model and a tripartite evolutionary game model with leading enterprises, governments and other cooperative subjects composed of small and medium-sized enterprises, universities and institutes as the main body, studies the stability strategy selection of the tripartite subjects, and takes the innovation consortium for the photonic industry in Shaanxi Province as an example to carry out simulation analysis of the game model. Leading enterprises take the lead in putting forward the basic proposition of forming an innovation consortium guided by the major needs of national key core technologies, government departments support and supervise the formation, and other cooperative entities with universities, institutes and small and medium-sized enterprises as members provide resources such as talent supply, technical support, and cutting-edge research information according to their own characteristics, and finally complete the research of key core technologies and the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. Based on this theoretical model, this paper puts forward the basic assumptions such as subject benefit, default penalty, and the probability of success of key core technologies in different scenarios, determines the benefit matrix and replication dynamic equation of the tripartite evolutionary game model, and analyzes the eigenvalues and stability strategy points of the model with the help of Jacobian matrix. In this paper, taking the innovation consortium led by Shaanxi Chasing Photonics Industry Pilot Innovation Center Co., Ltd. as a leading enterprise as an example, after obtaining data through the official website, using MatlabR 2022b software to analyze the initial cooperation willingness of the tripartite cooperation subjects, the success probability of key core technology research, the government support, the punishment for breach of contract, and the The specific analysis results of the influence of the income distribution coefficient on the evolution results are as follows: (1) the increase of the government's initial willingness to cooperate will have a positive impact on the cooperation willingness of the other two parties, and when the government's willingness to cooperate is lower than a certain threshold, the leading enterprises and other cooperative entities will no longer participate in the cooperation; The growth rate of cooperation willingness of other cooperative entities increases, and the impact of the initial cooperation willingness of other cooperative entities on the evolution results is less than that of leading enterprises. (2) The government's willingness to cooperate is very little affected by the probability of success in tackling key core technologies when leading enterprises and other cooperative entities participate, while the cooperation willingness of leading enterprises is more significantly affected by this probability change than that of other cooperative entities. (3) The increase or decrease of government support has a greater impact on the strategic changes of leading enterprises than on other partners, that is, leading enterprises and other cooperative entities can obtain fixed benefits by paying less costs, and leading enterprises are more concerned about the difference between benefits and costs when making decisions. (4) The penalty for breach of contract by the cooperative entity is an effective means to promote cooperation. With the increase of fines, the willingness of other partners to cooperate decreases faster than that of leading enterprises, that is, if the leading enterprises default in the cooperation, the impact on the willingness of the three parties to cooperate is much greater than that of other partners. (5) The decrease of the revenue distribution coefficient will lead to a significant decline in the willingness of leading enterprises to participate, which will then lead to a decrease in the probability of success in tackling key core technologies, and the income of other cooperative entities will also decrease, and finally make the willingness of both parties to cooperate tend to zero. Based on the above research results, this paper puts forward policy recommendations, including evaluating whether the innovation consortium is oriented to key core technologies, the difficulty and probability of success of key core technology research, supporting the acceleration of the incubation and cultivation of leading enterprises and improving the qualification and elimination mechanism of leading technology enterprises, providing real-time dynamic resource supply according to the needs of different stages in the whole process of cooperation, and building a multi-chain integrated innovation ecosystem. However, due to the limitations of the industry and research conditions of the research object, the parameter assignment in the simulation part of this paper can only reflect the typical situation of the industry, and our work does not have the universality to cover various industries.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

方炜,周明居.面向关键核心技术的创新联合体合作策略研究[J].,2024,44(21).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-17
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-19
  • 录用日期:2024-04-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
关闭
关闭