Abstract:Improving environmental performance is the key point of enterprises' green transformation and high-quality development, which has been widely of concern by academia and business circles. However, most of the literature focuses on evaluating the implementation effect of government policies, and few studies directly establish the relationship between environmental regulation and enterprise environmental performance. Therefore, based on the optimal distinctiveness theory, environmental performance is the systematic effect of enterprises' improvement of environmental management behavior under regulatory policies and standards. Under the mature logic of "pressure-behavior-result", this study constructs a theoretical model, collects the questionnaire survey data of 294 manufacturing enterprises in Guangdong province, and empirically tests the path of command (CER) and market-incentive environmental regulation (MER) on enterprise environmental performance (EP). The results show that CER and MER have a significant positive impact on EP, and the positive effect of CER is more significant. Dual environmental regulation has a considerable positive impact on enterprise green innovation. Under the pressure of the "big stick" policy of CER, enterprises are more likely to carry out compliant green innovation (CGI), that is, being the same, while under the "carrot" policy of MER, they are more inclined to implement strategic green innovation (SGI), that is, being different. CGI and SGI play a mediating role between dual environmental regulation and EP. CGI and SGI have complementary effects in the process of improving EP. Therefore, the government should pay attention to the collaborative use of different environmental regulation tools when further strengthening environmental regulation.