高校教师科研评价的理念、方法和程序对教师科研行为的影响 ——基于满意度的视角

The Influence of Ideas, Methods and Procedures of University Teachers" Scientific Research Evaluation on Teachers" Scientific Research Behavior -from the perspective of satisfaction.

摘要:

良好的高校教师科研评价制度是激励教师科研意愿和持续科研行为的“助推器”,也是提升高校科研竞争力和整体办学实力的“压舱石”。通过对8所不同类型高校446名教师进行问卷调查,综合运用多元线形回归、bootstrap检验等方法分析了大学教师科研评价理念、方法和程序对教师科研行为的影响。研究发现:(1)发展性评价理念、质量导向评价方法以及民主性评价程序对大学教师积极性科研行为具有显著正向影响；(2)科研制度满意度在上述关系中发挥了部分中介效应,即发展性评价理念、质量导向评价方法以及民主性评价程序能够通过增强教师对科研评价制度的满意度而激发自身主动性科研行为；(3)大学教师科研评价的结果性评价理念、数量导向评价方法以及威权性评价程序对大学教师的消极性科研行为具有显著正向影响；(4)制度满意度在数量导向评价方法、威权性评价程序与大学教师消极性科研行为中发挥了部分中介效应,但在结果性评价理念和消极性科研行为中不存在中介效应。由此建议高校应适时调整科研评价制度,包括建立发展性评价为主,结果性评价为辅的评价理念；充分关注教师科研成果的质量的高与低而不局限于数量的多与少；肯定评价者和被评价者的独立价值,充分运用民主性评价程序调动教师参与科研评价的积极性。

Abstract:

Absrtact: A good evaluation system of university teachers' scientific research is a "booster" to stimulate teachers' scientific research will and continuous scientific research behavior, and also a "ballast stone" to enhance the scientific research competitiveness and overall school-running strength of universities. Through a questionnaire survey of 446 teachers in 8 different types of universities, this paper analyzes the influence of the ideas, methods and procedures of university teachers' scientific research evaluation on teachers' scientific research behavior by using the methods of multiple linear regression and bootstrap test. The findings are as follows: (1) Developmental evaluation concepts, quality-oriented evaluation methods and democratic evaluation procedures have a significant positive impact on university teachers' active scientific research behavior; (2) The satisfaction of scientific research system plays a part in the above relationship, that is, the developmental evaluation concept, quality-oriented evaluation method and democratic evaluation procedure can stimulate teachers' active scientific research behavior by enhancing their satisfaction with scientific research evaluation system; (3) The concept of outcome evaluation, quantitative evaluation method and authoritarian evaluation procedure of university teachers' scientific research evaluation have a significant positive impact on university teachers' negative scientific research behavior; (4) System satisfaction plays a part of mediating effect in quantitative evaluation method, authoritarian evaluation procedure and negative scientific research behavior of university teachers, but there is no mediating effect in outcome evaluation idea and negative scientific research behavior. Therefore, it is suggested that colleges and universities should adjust the evaluation system of scientific research in time, including establishing the evaluation concept of developmental evaluation as the mainstay and outcome evaluation as the supplement; Pay full attention to the quality of teachers' scientific research achievements, not just the quantity; Affirm the independent value of the evaluator and the evaluated, and make full use of democratic evaluation procedures to mobilize the enthusiasm of teachers to participate in scientific research evaluation.