颠覆性技术的“科林格里奇困境”与合规治理出路

The "Collingridge Dilemma" of Disruptive Technology and the Way out of Compliance Governance

摘要:

颠覆性技术的发展,难免带来风险控制与治理难题,陷入所谓“科林格里奇困境”。颠覆性技术治理往往面临时间、知识、权力三重错位,导致监管机构与企业主体二元对立,法律制度与企业制度之间产生鸿沟且双重失守。基于颠覆性技术与内外制度的双重协同演化逻辑,推导出“全流程风险防控、全过程信息公开、多主体协同参与”的合规治理思路,能针对性地纠正技术治理的时间错位、弥补技术预测的不确定性、避免外部监管的被动性,进而结合颠覆性技术所处的生态位阶段构建协同合规治理体系,以助推我国颠覆性技术高质量发展。

Abstract:

The development of disruptive technologies inevitably brings difficulties in risk control and governance, and falls into the so-called "Collingridge dilemma". Disruptive technology governance often faces the triple dislocation of time, knowledge and power, resulting in the dual opposition between the regulatory body and the enterprise body, and the gap between the legal system and the enterprise system. Based on the dual synergistic evolution logic of disruptive technology and internal and external systems, the compliance governance idea of "whole-process risk prevention and control, whole-process information disclosure, and multi-subject collaborative participation" is derived, which can specifically correct the time dislocation of technology governance, make up for the uncertainty of technology prediction, and avoid the passivity of external supervision. Furthermore, a collaborative compliance governance system is built according to the ecological niche stage of disruptive technologies to boost the high-quality development of disruptive technologies in China.