学术研讨会-新质生产力视域下的开放科学发展与治理
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

清华大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Open Science Development and Governance from the Perspective of New Quality Productivity
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    开放科学是数字化转型中科学发展的必然趋势,也是形成新质生产力以构建国际科技合作与竞争优势的新焦点。本文旨在探讨开放科学对促进新质生产力发展的具体作用并分析适合中国的开放科学治理模式。通过文献调研与比较分析方法,梳理和明确开放科学推动科研范式产生“质变”的重要意义,选取欧盟、美国与中国的代表性开放科学实践为案例,从规划政策、技能培训、评价体系与投入格局等方面对比不同开放科学模式的差异。透过科学治理视角,发现欧盟兼具宏观顶层设计与微观评价体系改革,美国强调多元投入与广泛参与的开放格局,中国则拥有高政策支持度与期刊参与度但存在布局完整性低与市场灵活性差等不足,可通过加强科技规划、培养专业人才、完善评价体系和优化资助结构等途径构建中国式开放科学治理体系,以科技创新助力新质生产力建设。

    Abstract:

    Open science is an inevitable trend of scientific development in digital transformation, and it is also a new focus for forming new quality productivity to build international scientific and technological cooperation and competitive advantages. This paper aims to explore the specific role of open science in promoting the development of new quality productivity and analyze the open science governance model suitable for China. Through literature research and comparative analysis methods, this paper sorts out and clarifies the important significance of open science in promoting the "qualitative change" of scientific research paradigms. Representative open science practices in the European Union, the United States and China are selected as cases to compare the differences in different open science models in terms of planning policies, skills training, evaluation systems and investment patterns. From the perspective of scientific governance, it is found that the European Union has both macro-top-level design and micro-evaluation system reform, the United States emphasizes diversified investment and an open pattern of extensive participation, and China has high policy support and journal participation, but has shortcomings such as low layout integrity and poor market flexibility. It is possible to build a Chinese-style open science governance system by strengthening scientific and technological planning, cultivating professional talents, improving the evaluation system and optimizing the funding structure, so as to help build new quality productivity with scientific and technological innovation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

罗昊雯,李正风.学术研讨会-新质生产力视域下的开放科学发展与治理[J].,2024,44(14).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-27
  • 最后修改日期:2024-07-10
  • 录用日期:2024-07-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

联系电话:020-37635126(一、三、五)/83568469(二、四)(查稿)、37674300/82648174(编校)、37635521/82640284(财务)、83549092(传真)

联系地址:广东省广州市先烈中路100号大院60栋3楼302室(510070) 广东省广州市越秀区东风西路207-213星河亚洲金融中心A座8楼(510033)

邮箱:kjgl83568469@126.com kjgl@chinajournal.net.cn

科技管理研究 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
关闭
关闭