高校基础研究供给与新质生产力发展：来自探索性案例与组态分析的研究

Supply of Basic Research in Universities and Development of New Quality Productivity: Research from Exploratory Cases and Configuration Analysis

摘要:

高校作为我国基础研究的主要主要载体，是推动我国实体经济部门高质量发展，构建中国特色创新体系的关键动力，然而，“高校基础研究供给究竟如何推动促进新质生产力发展？”等问题，却仍待更进一步的理论诠释与机理探索。为此，本研究基于中国式现代化理论，开展了一项探索性案例与组态分析的混合研究。结果显示：（1）通过探索性案例研究揭示了新质生产力的理论内涵、结构维度与观测方式；（2）高校基础研究供给能够立足知识载体的“蓄水池”效应，从“知识池”与“人才池”的知识转移过程，推动实体经济部门高质量发展与和谐社会构建，促进新质生产力发展，且数字经济发展是这一实现机制过程中的重要边界条件；（3）从“人才集聚”和“资源集聚”视角，提出了两种高绩效新质生产力发展方案。根据研究结论，建议相关政府应加强顶层设计与财政支持力度，进一步打造基础研究核心竞争力，攻克“卡脖子”问题，以加快发展新质生产力。

Abstract:

As the main carrier of basic research in China, universities are the key driving force for promoting the high-quality development of the real economy sector and building an innovation system with Chinese characteristics. However, questions such as "how does the supply of basic research in universities promote the development of new quality productivity?" still require further theoretical interpretation and mechanism exploration. Therefore, based on the theory of Chinese path to modernization, this study carried out a hybrid study of exploratory cases and configuration analysis. The results showed that: (1) the theoretical connotation, structural dimensions, and observation methods of new quality productivity were revealed through exploratory case studies; (2) The supply of basic research in universities can be based on the "reservoir" effect of knowledge carriers, promoting the high-quality development of the real economy sector and the construction of a harmonious society through the knowledge transfer process between the "knowledge pool" and the "talent pool", and promoting the development of new quality productive forces. The development of the digital economy is an important boundary condition in this implementation mechanism process; (3) Two high-performance new quality productivity development plans have been proposed from the perspectives of "talent aggregation" and "resource aggregation". According to the research findings, it is suggested that relevant governments should strengthen top-level design and financial support, further build core competitiveness in basic research, overcome bottleneck problems, and accelerate the development of new quality productivity.